Department of Periodontics, Terna Dental College & Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai 400706, India.
Platelets. 2011;22(5):353-60. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2011.552135. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in periodontal regeneration is not well understood and the definite clinical viability of blood derived platelets lacks clarity. Also, the use of thrombin for platelet activation is disputed. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of blood derived platelets without thrombin activation, alone or in combination with bovine anorganic bone mineral (ABM), in the treatment of human periodontal intrabony defects. PRP was prepared using a simple tabletop centrifuge and activated using calcium chloride without the addition of thrombin. This PRP was used alone (in Group A) and in combination with bovine ABM (in Group B) in the treatment of human periodontal angular defects. Both the control and the test groups showed definite improvement in clinical parameters. On comparison, however, there was a statistically significant improvement in the probing pocket depths and relative attachment level in Group B over Group A at 3 and 6 months intervals, whereas at the end of 9 months this difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the relative defect depth. Within the limitations of this study and the type of PRP used, i.e. without thrombin mediated activation, it can be concluded that both PRP and PRP combined with bovine ABM results in significant clinical improvement. Albeit statistically insignificant, there is a preponderance of better clinical results with the addition of ABM to PRP. Further studies need to be carried out on a larger sample size to confirm the results of the present study.
富血小板血浆(PRP)在牙周再生中的疗效尚不清楚,血液来源的血小板的明确临床可行性也不清楚。此外,血小板的激活使用凝血酶也存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估未经凝血酶激活的血液来源血小板单独或与牛无机骨矿物质(ABM)联合用于治疗人类牙周骨内缺损的疗效。PRP 使用简单的台式离心机制备,并用氯化钙激活,无需添加凝血酶。将 PRP 单独使用(在 A 组)和与牛 ABM 联合使用(在 B 组)治疗人类牙周角缺损。对照组和实验组的临床参数均有明显改善。然而,相比之下,B 组在 3 个月和 6 个月时的探诊袋深度和相对附着水平较 A 组有统计学显著改善,而在 9 个月时这种差异无统计学意义。两组之间的相对缺损深度无统计学差异。在本研究的限制内和使用的 PRP 类型(即未经凝血酶介导的激活)下,可以得出结论,PRP 单独使用和与牛 ABM 联合使用均可导致显著的临床改善。虽然统计学上无显著性差异,但 ABM 与 PRP 联合使用的临床效果更好。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究来证实本研究的结果。