Melbourne Dental School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int Dent J. 2011 Feb;61(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00003.x.
A survey was conducted of 100 dental schools worldwide to investigate the current teaching of posterior resin composite restorations. A 20 multi-part question questionnaire was emailed to the selected schools. Schools were selected by ability to understand and respond in English. The questionnaire consisted of four open-ended questions and 16 closed questions on topics such as material selection for restoring posterior teeth, preclinical teaching of resin composite for posterior teeth, restoration size, contraindications, matrix placement methods, lining use, adhesive selection and finishing. Forty-six schools responded. The outcomes showed all schools included the teaching of resin composite for posterior restorations but varied. The majority of schools (63%) no longer taught amalgam as the preferred posterior restorative material. Half of the schools surveyed set numerical clinical requirements for restoration placement. Australian schools had no requirements whilst 92% of Asian schools did. There was a consensus that larger restorations were less suitable for resin composite. Selection of adhesives depended on region. Generally, the schools surveyed showed minor variations philosophically in teaching of the use and placement of resin composite restorations.
对全球 100 所牙科学校进行了一项调查，以了解当前对后牙树脂复合材料修复的教学情况。向选定的学校发送了一份 20 多部分的问题问卷调查。通过英语理解和回应能力选择学校。问卷包括四个开放式问题和 16 个关于以下主题的封闭式问题：后牙修复材料的选择、后牙树脂复合材料的临床前教学、修复体大小、禁忌症、隔片放置方法、衬垫使用、粘结剂选择和修整。46 所学校做出了回应。结果表明，所有学校都教授后牙树脂复合材料修复，但有所不同。大多数学校（63%）不再将汞合金作为首选的后牙修复材料。一半的调查学校为修复体放置设定了数值临床要求。澳大利亚的学校没有要求，而 92%的亚洲学校有要求。大家普遍认为较大的修复体不太适合使用树脂复合材料。粘结剂的选择取决于地区。总的来说，接受调查的学校在树脂复合材料修复的使用和放置教学方面存在细微的哲学差异。
