Suppr超能文献

发展性阅读障碍是否具有模态特异性?意大利阅读障碍者的视听比较。

Is developmental dyslexia modality specific? A visual-auditory comparison of Italian dyslexics.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Roma La Sapienza, Italy.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1718-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.050. Epub 2011 Mar 5.

Abstract

Although developmental dyslexia is often referred to as a cross-modal disturbance, tests of different modalities using the same stimuli are lacking. We compared the performance of 23 children with dyslexia and 42 chronologically matched control readers on reading versus repetition tasks and visual versus auditory lexical decision using the same stimuli. With respect to control readers, children with dyslexia were impaired only on stimuli in the visual modality; they had no deficit on the repetition and auditory lexical decision tasks. By applying the rate-amount model (Faust et al., 1999), we showed that performance of children with dyslexia on visual (but not auditory) tasks was associated with that of control readers by a linear relationship (with a 1.78 slope), suggesting that a global factor accounts for visual (but not auditory) task performance. We conclude that the processing of linguistic stimuli in the visual and auditory modalities is carried out by independent processes and that dyslexic children have a selective deficit in the visual modality.

摘要

尽管发育性阅读障碍通常被称为跨模态障碍,但缺乏使用相同刺激的不同模态的测试。我们比较了 23 名阅读障碍儿童和 42 名年龄匹配的对照组读者在使用相同刺激的阅读与重复任务以及视觉与听觉词汇判断任务中的表现。对于对照组读者,阅读障碍儿童仅在视觉模态的刺激上受到损害;他们在重复和听觉词汇判断任务中没有缺陷。通过应用速率-量模型(Faust 等人,1999),我们表明,阅读障碍儿童在视觉(但不是听觉)任务上的表现与对照组读者通过线性关系(斜率为 1.78)相关,这表明一个全局因素可以解释视觉(但不是听觉)任务的表现。我们的结论是,语言刺激在视觉和听觉模态中的处理是由独立的过程进行的,而阅读障碍儿童在视觉模态中存在选择性缺陷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验