• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读中拼写不一致的成本与收益:来自跨语言比较的证据

Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.

作者信息

Marinelli Chiara Valeria, Romani Cristina, Burani Cristina, McGowan Victoria A, Zoccolotti Pierluigi

机构信息

Lab of Applied Psychology and Intervention, Department of History Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Salento, Italy.

Neuropsychological Research Centre, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0157457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157457. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0157457
PMID:27355364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4927093/
Abstract

We compared reading acquisition in English and Italian children up to late primary school analyzing RTs and errors as a function of various psycholinguistic variables and changes due to experience. Our results show that reading becomes progressively more reliant on larger processing units with age, but that this is modulated by consistency of the language. In English, an inconsistent orthography, reliance on larger units occurs earlier on and it is demonstrated by faster RTs, a stronger effect of lexical variables and lack of length effect (by fifth grade). However, not all English children are able to master this mode of processing yielding larger inter-individual variability. In Italian, a consistent orthography, reliance on larger units occurs later and it is less pronounced. This is demonstrated by larger length effects which remain significant even in older children and by larger effects of a global factor (related to speed of orthographic decoding) explaining changes of performance across ages. Our results show the importance of considering not only overall performance, but inter-individual variability and variability between conditions when interpreting cross-linguistic differences.

摘要

我们通过分析反应时间(RTs)和错误情况,将其作为各种心理语言学变量以及因经验导致的变化的函数,对小学高年级之前的英国和意大利儿童的阅读习得情况进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,随着年龄的增长,阅读越来越依赖更大的处理单元,但这会受到语言一致性的调节。在英语中,拼写不一致,对更大单元的依赖出现得更早,这表现为更快的反应时间、词汇变量的更强影响以及长度效应的缺失(到五年级时)。然而,并非所有英国儿童都能够掌握这种处理模式,从而导致个体间差异更大。在意大利语中,拼写一致,对更大单元的依赖出现得较晚且不太明显。这表现为更大的长度效应,即使在年龄较大的儿童中也仍然显著,以及一个全局因素(与正字法解码速度相关)的更大影响,该因素解释了不同年龄段表现的变化。我们的研究结果表明,在解释跨语言差异时,不仅要考虑总体表现,还要考虑个体间差异以及不同条件之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/08f3ebf328da/pone.0157457.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/7eee096c0cf7/pone.0157457.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/9ce9fd6cbc4b/pone.0157457.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/f3e1e75c6f4d/pone.0157457.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/17de25d325bb/pone.0157457.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/08f3ebf328da/pone.0157457.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/7eee096c0cf7/pone.0157457.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/9ce9fd6cbc4b/pone.0157457.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/f3e1e75c6f4d/pone.0157457.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/17de25d325bb/pone.0157457.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/4927093/08f3ebf328da/pone.0157457.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.阅读中拼写不一致的成本与收益:来自跨语言比较的证据
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0157457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157457. eCollection 2016.
2
Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.正字法一致性对大声朗读中的形态加工有影响:一项跨语言研究的证据。
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12952. doi: 10.1111/desc.12952. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
The ability to learn new written words is modulated by language orthographic consistency.学习新书面单词的能力受到语言正字法一致性的调节。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0228129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228129. eCollection 2020.
4
Density and length in the neighborhood: Explaining cross-linguistic differences in learning to read in English and Dutch.邻域中的密度与长度:解释英语和荷兰语阅读学习中的跨语言差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Nov;139:127-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
5
Effects of orthographic consistency on eye movement behavior: German and English children and adults process the same words differently.正字法一致性对眼动行为的影响:德国儿童和成人与英国儿童和成人对相同单词的处理方式不同。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
6
Spelling Acquisition in English and Italian: A Cross-Linguistic Study.英语和意大利语的拼写习得:一项跨语言研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 8;6:1843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01843. eCollection 2015.
7
Decision times in orthographic processing: a cross-linguistic study.正字法加工中的决策时间:一项跨语言研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Feb;241(2):585-599. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06542-0. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation.正字法深度及其对阅读普遍预测因子的影响:跨语言研究。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):551-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363406. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
9
The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.语音识别中拼字一致性效应的发展:从次词汇参与到词汇参与。
Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):547-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
10
Modeling the relationship between rapid automatized naming and literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic consistency.模拟正字法一致性不同的多种语言中快速自动命名与读写能力之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Mar;143:48-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impaired instance acquisition as a cause of the comorbidity of learning disorders in young adults.作为年轻成年人学习障碍共病原因的实例习得受损。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 10;19:1560362. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1560362. eCollection 2025.
2
Letter and Word Processing in Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence from a Two-Alternative Forced Choice Task.发育性阅读障碍中的字母与单词处理:来自二选一强制选择任务的证据
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;12(5):572. doi: 10.3390/children12050572.
3
The Enduring Challenge of Literacy Issues in Adulthood: Investigating Spelling Deficits among Dyslexic Italian University Students.

本文引用的文献

1
Spelling Acquisition in English and Italian: A Cross-Linguistic Study.英语和意大利语的拼写习得:一项跨语言研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 8;6:1843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01843. eCollection 2015.
2
Triangulation of the neurocomputational architecture underpinning reading aloud.支撑大声朗读的神经计算架构的三角测量法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 14;112(28):E3719-28. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502032112. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Does pronounceability modulate the letter string deficit of children with dyslexia? A study with the rate and amount model.
成人识字问题的长期挑战:对意大利诵读困难大学生拼写缺陷的调查。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):712. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070712.
4
Functional neuroanatomy of reading in Czech: Evidence of a dual-route processing architecture in a shallow orthography.捷克语阅读的功能神经解剖学:浅正字法中双路径加工架构的证据
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1037365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037365. eCollection 2022.
5
The Simple View of Reading in Children Acquiring a Regular Orthography (Italian): A Network Analysis Approach.儿童习得正字法(意大利语)中的阅读简易观:一种网络分析方法
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:686914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686914. eCollection 2021.
6
Testing the Specificity of Predictors of Reading, Spelling and Maths: A New Model of the Association Among Learning Skills Based on Competence, Performance and Acquisition.测试阅读、拼写和数学预测指标的特异性:一种基于能力、表现和习得的学习技能关联新模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 7;14:573998. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.573998. eCollection 2020.
7
Sleepiness, Neuropsychological Skills, and Scholastic Learning in Children.儿童的嗜睡、神经心理技能与学业学习
Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 7;10(8):529. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080529.
8
The Neuropsychological Profile of Attention Deficits of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Update on the Daytime Attentional Impairment.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者注意力缺陷的神经心理学特征:白天注意力损害的最新情况
Brain Sci. 2020 May 27;10(6):325. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10060325.
9
Predicting individual differences in reading, spelling and maths in a sample of typically developing children: A study in the perspective of comorbidity.预测典型发展儿童样本中阅读、拼写和数学的个体差异:共病视角下的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0231937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231937. eCollection 2020.
10
The ability to learn new written words is modulated by language orthographic consistency.学习新书面单词的能力受到语言正字法一致性的调节。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0228129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228129. eCollection 2020.
可发音性是否会调节诵读困难儿童的字母串缺陷?一项基于速率和数量模型的研究。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 2;5:1353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01353. eCollection 2014.
4
Effects of orthographic consistency on eye movement behavior: German and English children and adults process the same words differently.正字法一致性对眼动行为的影响:德国儿童和成人与英国儿童和成人对相同单词的处理方式不同。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
5
Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.平均成绩能充分反映阅读表现吗?一项跨语言研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 19;5:903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00903. eCollection 2014.
6
Is developmental dyslexia modality specific? A visual-auditory comparison of Italian dyslexics.发展性阅读障碍是否具有模态特异性?意大利阅读障碍者的视听比较。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1718-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.050. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
7
Letter and letter-string processing in developmental dyslexia.发展性阅读障碍中的字母和字母串处理。
Cortex. 2010 Nov-Dec;46(10):1272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.阅读障碍者大脑的功能异常:神经影像学研究的定量荟萃分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Oct;30(10):3299-308. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20752.
9
Isolating global and specific factors in developmental dyslexia: a study based on the rate and amount model (RAM).分离发育性阅读障碍中的整体因素和特定因素:一项基于速率和数量模型(RAM)的研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(4):551-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1257-9. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
10
On the advantage of 'shallow' orthographies: number and grain size of the orthographic units or consistency per se?论“浅层”正字法的优势:正字法单元的数量与粒度还是一致性本身?
Dev Sci. 2006 Sep;9(5):443-4; discussion 451-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00525.x.