Medical Research Council Collaborative Centre for Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e17205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017205.
Studies investigating the prevention of weight gain differ considerably in design and quality, which impedes pooling them in conventional meta-analyses, the basis for evidence-based policy making. This study is aimed at quantifying the prospective association between measured physical activity and fat mass in children, using a meta-analysis method that allows inclusion of heterogeneous studies by adjusting for differences through eliciting and incorporating expert opinion.
Studies on prevention of weight gain using objectively measured exposure and outcome were eligible; they were adopted from a recently published systematic review. Differences in study quality and design were considered as internal and external biases and captured in checklists. Study results were converted to correlation coefficients and biases were considered either additive or proportional on this scale. The extent and uncertainty of biases in each study were elicited in a formal process by six quantitatively-trained assessors and five subject-matter specialists. Biases for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling. Results were combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis.
The combined correlation of the unadjusted results from the six studies was -0.04 (95%CI: -0.22, 0.14) with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 78%), which makes it difficult to interpret the result. After bias-adjustment the pooled correlation was -0.01 (95%CI: -0.18, 0.16) with apparent study compatibility (I² = 0%).
By using this method the prospective association between physical activity and fat mass could be quantitatively synthesized; the result suggests no association. Objectively measured physical activity may not be the key determinant of unhealthy weight gain in children.
研究预防体重增加的设计和质量差异很大,这阻碍了将它们纳入传统的荟萃分析中,而荟萃分析是循证决策的基础。本研究旨在使用一种荟萃分析方法,通过调整专家意见来量化儿童身体活动与脂肪量之间的前瞻性关联,从而定量研究身体活动与脂肪量之间的前瞻性关联。该方法允许纳入异质性研究。
使用客观测量的暴露和结果来预防体重增加的研究是合格的;这些研究是从最近发表的系统综述中采用的。研究质量和设计的差异被认为是内部和外部偏差,并在清单中捕获。研究结果转换为相关系数,并根据此尺度将偏差视为加性或比例性。六位受过定量培训的评估员和五位主题专家通过正式程序评估了每个研究中的偏差程度和不确定性。使用中位数汇总在每个评估员之间合并偏差。使用随机效应荟萃分析对来自多个研究的结果进行合并。
六项研究的未调整结果的合并相关系数为-0.04(95%CI:-0.22,0.14),存在很大的异质性(I²=78%),这使得结果难以解释。经过偏差调整后,合并相关系数为-0.01(95%CI:-0.18,0.16),研究兼容性明显(I²=0%)。
通过使用这种方法,可以对身体活动与脂肪量之间的前瞻性关联进行定量综合;结果表明没有关联。客观测量的身体活动可能不是儿童不健康体重增加的关键决定因素。