Suppr超能文献

调整抗结核治疗期间蛋白酶抑制剂剂量后,HIV 感染儿童的抗逆转录病毒治疗结局。

Antiretroviral therapy outcomes in HIV-infected children after adjusting protease inhibitor dosing during tuberculosis treatment.

机构信息

Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e17273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017273.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modification of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy is required for HIV-infected children co-treated for tuberculosis (TB). We aimed to determine virologic and toxicity outcomes among TB/HIV co-treated children with the following modifications to their antiretroviral therapy (ART): (1) super-boosted LPV/r, (2) double-dose LPV/r or (3) ritonavir.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A medical record review was conducted at two clinical sites in Johannesburg, South Africa. The records of children 6-24 months of age initiating LPV/r-based therapy were reviewed. Children co-treated for TB were categorized based on the modifications made to their ART regimen and were compared to children of the same age at each site not treated for TB. Included are 526 children, 294 (56%) co-treated for TB. All co-treated children had more severe HIV disease, including lower CD4 percents and worse growth indicators, than comparisons. Children in the super-boosted group (n = 156) were as likely to be virally suppressed (<400 copies/ml) at 6 months as comparisons (69.2% vs. 74.8%, p = 0.36). Children in the double-dose (n = 47) and ritonavir groups (n = 91) were significantly less likely to be virally suppressed at 6 months (53.1% and 49.3%) than comparisons (74.8% and 82.1%; p = 0.02 and p<0.0001, respectively). At 12 months only children in the ritonavir group still had lower rates of virological suppression relative to comparisons (63.9% vs 83.3% p<0.05). Grade 1 or greater ALT elevations were more common in the super-boosted (75%) than double-dose (54.6%) or ritonavir (33.9%) groups (p = 0.09 and p<0.0001) but grade 3/4 elevations were observed in 3 (13.6%) of the super-boosted, 7 (15.9%) of the double-dose and 5 (8.9%) of the ritonavir group (p = 0.81 and p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Good short-term virologic outcomes were achieved in children co-treated for TB and HIV who received super-boosted LPV/r. Treatment limiting toxicity was rare. Strategies for increased dosing of LPV/r with TB treatment warrant further investigation.

摘要

背景

在同时接受结核病(TB)和 HIV 治疗的儿童中,需要对利托那韦增效洛匹那韦(LPV/r)为基础的抗逆转录病毒治疗进行调整。我们旨在确定对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)进行以下调整的 TB/HIV 共治疗儿童的病毒学和毒性结果:(1)超级强化 LPV/r,(2)双倍剂量 LPV/r 或(3)利托那韦。

方法和发现

在南非约翰内斯堡的两个临床地点进行了病历回顾。对开始 LPV/r 治疗的 6-24 个月大的儿童的记录进行了审查。根据他们的 ART 方案的调整,将接受结核病共同治疗的儿童分为不同组别,并与每个地点未接受结核病治疗的同年龄儿童进行比较。共纳入 526 名儿童,其中 294 名(56%)接受结核病共同治疗。所有接受共同治疗的儿童的 HIV 疾病都更严重,包括较低的 CD4 百分比和较差的生长指标,与对照组相比。超级强化组(n=156)的儿童在 6 个月时病毒抑制的可能性与对照组相同(69.2%与 74.8%,p=0.36)。双倍剂量组(n=47)和利托那韦组(n=91)的儿童在 6 个月时病毒抑制的可能性明显低于对照组(53.1%和 49.3%;p=0.02 和 p<0.0001)。在 12 个月时,只有利托那韦组的儿童的病毒学抑制率仍低于对照组(63.9%与 83.3%,p<0.05)。超级强化组(75%)比双倍剂量组(54.6%)或利托那韦组(33.9%)更常见 1 级或更高级别的丙氨酸转氨酶升高(p=0.09 和 p<0.0001),但超级强化组有 3 例(13.6%)、双倍剂量组有 7 例(15.9%)和利托那韦组有 5 例(8.9%)出现 3/4 级升高(p=0.81 和 p=0.29)。

结论

在接受结核病和 HIV 共同治疗的儿童中,接受超级强化 LPV/r 的儿童取得了良好的短期病毒学结果。治疗限制毒性很少见。增加 LPV/r 剂量与结核病治疗的策略值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验