• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动词网络强化治疗对中度至重度失语症的影响。

Effect of verb network strengthening treatment in moderate-to-severe aphasia.

机构信息

The University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 May;20(2):131-45. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036). Epub 2011 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036)
PMID:21386047
Abstract

PURPOSE

This Phase II treatment study examined the effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on individuals with moderate-to-severe aphasia. Research questions addressed (a) pre- to posttreatment changes and pretreatment to treatment phase changes on probe sentences containing trained verbs (e.g., "The carpenter is measuring the stairs") and semantically related untrained verbs (e.g., "The nurse is weighing the baby"); (b) lexical retrieval changes in single-word naming, sentence, and discourse measures; (c) functional communication by way of proxy and participant report; and (d) error evolution.

METHOD

A multiple-baseline approach across participants was used. Effect sizes were calculated for pre- and posttreatment and maintenance probe responses. A C statistic was used to determine changes from the baseline to treatment phases.

RESULTS

One participant exhibited improvement on all generalization measures, whereas the other participant exhibited more limited generalization. Both participants showed improvement on the functional communication measure.

CONCLUSIONS

As predicted, the participants did not show the same extent of improvement that was observed in participants with more moderate aphasia (Edmonds, Nadeu, & Kiran, 2009). Nonetheless, the findings suggest that VNeST may be appropriate for persons with moderate-to-severe aphasia, especially with a small adaptation to the treatment protocol that will be retained for future iterations of VNeST.

摘要

目的

本项 II 期治疗研究旨在考察 Verb Network Strengthening Treatment(VNeST)对中重度失语症患者的影响。研究问题包括:(a)在包含训练动词(如“木匠正在测量楼梯”)和语义相关的未训练动词(如“护士正在给婴儿称重”)的探针句中,治疗前后的变化以及治疗前到治疗阶段的变化;(b)在单字命名、句子和语篇测量方面的词汇检索变化;(c)通过代理和参与者报告的功能沟通;以及(d)错误演变。

方法

采用参与者跨多个基线的方法。计算了治疗前后和维持探针反应的效果大小。使用 C 统计量来确定从基线到治疗阶段的变化。

结果

一名参与者在所有泛化测量中都表现出改善,而另一名参与者的泛化则表现出更有限的改善。两名参与者在功能沟通测量上都有所改善。

结论

正如预测的那样,参与者并没有表现出与中度失语症患者(Edmonds、Nadeu 和 Kiran,2009)相同程度的改善。尽管如此,这些发现表明,VNeST 可能适合中重度失语症患者,尤其是对治疗方案进行小的调整,以便在未来的 VNeST 迭代中保留。

相似文献

1
Effect of verb network strengthening treatment in moderate-to-severe aphasia.动词网络强化治疗对中度至重度失语症的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 May;20(2):131-45. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036). Epub 2011 Mar 8.
2
Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: extension and replication of previous findings.动词网络强化治疗(VNeST)对失语症患者的影响:先前研究结果的扩展与重复
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):S312-29. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0098.
3
Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on Lexical Retrieval of Content Words in Sentences in Persons with Aphasia.动词网络强化治疗(VNeST)对失语症患者句子中实词词汇检索的影响。
Aphasiology. 2009 Mar 1;23(3):402-424. doi: 10.1080/02687030802291339.
4
The contrast between cueing and/or observation in therapy for verb retrieval in post-stroke aphasia.中风后失语症动词检索治疗中提示和/或观察的对比。
J Commun Disord. 2015 Mar-Apr;54:43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
5
Semantic Feature Analysis: Further Examination of Outcomes.语义特征分析:结果的进一步检验
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S864-79. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0155.
6
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series.经颅直流电刺激联合动词网络强化治疗改善原发性进行性失语症患者的动词命名:一项病例系列研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jul 12;31(4):1736-1754. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00272. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
The trouble with nouns and verbs in Greek fluent aphasia.希腊语流利性失语症中名词和动词的问题。
J Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
8
Advances in the evaluation and treatment of speech apraxia.言语失用症评估与治疗的进展
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:327-36.
9
Effects of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on Sound-Level and Speech Production Errors in Individuals With Aphasia and Acquired Apraxia of Speech.动词网络强化治疗对失语症和获得性言语失用症个体的语音水平和言语产生错误的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1446-1458. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00141. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Type and frequency of phonetic errors in aphasics: therapeutic aspects.失语症患者语音错误的类型和频率:治疗方面
Rom J Neurol Psychiatry. 1992 Jan-Mar;30(1):47-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation as an Adjunct to Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study.经颅直流电刺激作为中风后慢性失语症动词网络强化治疗的辅助手段:一项双盲随机可行性研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 2;13:722402. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.722402. eCollection 2022.
2
Beyond Percent Correct: Measuring Change in Individual Picture Naming Ability.超越百分正确:衡量个体图片命名能力的变化。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):215-237. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00205. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.
中风患者对语义性失语症与音韵性失语症疗法的个体化反应。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 5;3(3):fcab174. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab174. eCollection 2021.
4
Telepractice Treatment for Aphasia: Association Between Clinical Outcomes and Client Satisfaction.失语症的远程治疗:临床结果与患者满意度之间的关联
Telemed Rep. 2021 Mar 24;2(1):118-124. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2020.0024. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness of Semantic-based Treatment in Persons with Aphasia.基于语义的治疗方法对失语症患者的有效性。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020 Sep;23(Suppl 2):S123-S129. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_558_20. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation May Improve Discourse Production in Healthy Older Adults.经颅直流电刺激可能改善健康老年人的话语表达能力。
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 26;11:935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00935. eCollection 2020.
7
Effect of Mandarin Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) in Mandarin-English bilinguals with aphasia: A single-case experimental design.失语症伴汉语-英语双语者的普通话动词网络强化治疗(VNeST)的效果:一项单病例实验设计。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(8):1224-1253. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1773278. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Treating limb apraxia via action semantics: a preliminary study.通过动作语义治疗肢体失用症:一项初步研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Aug;31(7):1145-1162. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1762672. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Semantic memory for objects, actions, and events: A novel test of event-related conceptual semantic knowledge.物体、动作和事件的语义记忆:事件相关概念语义知识的新测试。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;36(7-8):313-335. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1656604. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Communicative Strengths in Severe Aphasia: The Famous People Protocol and Its Value in Planning Treatment.重度失语症的交流强项:名人协议及其在治疗计划中的价值。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1010-1018. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0283. Epub 2019 May 21.