经颅直流电刺激联合动词网络强化治疗改善原发性进行性失语症患者的动词命名:一项病例系列研究。

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Chapman University, Irvine, CA.

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jul 12;31(4):1736-1754. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00272. Epub 2022 May 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are few evidence-based treatments for language deficits in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). PPA treatments are often adopted from the poststroke aphasia literature. The poststroke aphasia literature has shown promising results using Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST), a behavioral therapy that focuses on improving naming by producing verbs and their arguments in phrases and sentences. Emerging research in poststroke aphasia and PPA has shown promising results pairing behavioral language therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

METHOD

This study used a double-blind, within-subjects, sham-controlled crossover design to study the effect of anodal tDCS applied to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) plus VNeST versus VNeST plus sham stimulation in two individuals with nonfluent variant PPA and one individual with logopenic variant PPA. Participants received two phases of treatment, each with 15 1-hr sessions of VNeST. One phase paired VNeST with tDCS stimulation, and one with sham. For each phase, language testing was conducted at baseline, and at 1 week and 8 weeks posttreatment conclusion. For each participant, treatment efficacy was evaluated for each treatment phase by comparing the mean change in accuracy between baseline and the follow-up time points for naming trained verbs (primary outcome measure), untrained verbs, and nouns on the Object and Action Naming Battery. Mean change from baseline was also directly compared between tDCS and sham phases at each time point.

RESULTS

Results revealed a different pattern of outcomes for each of the participants. A tDCS advantage was not found for trained verbs for any participant. Two participants with nonfluent variant PPA had a tDCS advantage for generalization to naming of untrained verbs, which was apparent at 1 week and 8 weeks posttreatment. One participant with nonfluent variant also showed evidence of generalization to sentence production in the tDCS phase.

CONCLUSION

VNeST plus anodal tDCS stimulation of left IFG shows promising results for improving naming in PPA.

摘要

目的

原发性进行性失语症(PPA)的语言缺陷治疗方法很少有循证依据。PPA 的治疗方法通常是从脑卒中后失语症文献中采用的。脑卒中后失语症文献表明,使用动词网络强化治疗(VNeST)的方法有较好的效果,这种行为疗法侧重于通过在短语和句子中产生动词及其论元来改善命名。脑卒中后失语症和 PPA 的新研究表明,将行为语言治疗与经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)相结合有较好的效果。

方法

本研究采用双盲、自身对照、假刺激交叉设计,研究左额下回(IFG)的阳极 tDCS 联合 VNeST 与 VNeST 联合假刺激对 2 名非流利型 PPA 患者和 1 名语义型 PPA 患者的影响。参与者接受了两个阶段的治疗,每个阶段都有 15 个 1 小时的 VNeST 疗程。一个阶段将 VNeST 与 tDCS 刺激配对,另一个阶段与假刺激配对。在每个阶段,在基线和治疗结束后 1 周和 8 周时进行语言测试。对于每个参与者,通过比较命名训练动词(主要测量指标)、未训练动词和名词的准确性在基线和随访时间点之间的平均变化,来评估每个治疗阶段的治疗效果。在每个时间点,还直接比较 tDCS 阶段和假刺激阶段之间的基线平均变化。

结果

结果显示每个参与者的结果模式不同。对于任何参与者,都没有发现训练动词的 tDCS 优势。2 名非流利型 PPA 患者在未训练动词的泛化命名方面有 tDCS 优势,这种优势在治疗结束后 1 周和 8 周时明显。1 名非流利型 PPA 患者还显示了 tDCS 阶段对句子生成的泛化证据。

结论

VNeST 联合左 IFG 的阳极 tDCS 刺激显示出改善 PPA 命名的良好效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索