Suppr超能文献

儿童、生物银行与父母同意范围

Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul;19(7):735-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Abstract

The use of stored tissue samples from children for genetic research raises specific ethical questions that are not all analogous to those raised when adult participants are concerned. These include issues with regard to consent, as it is typically a parent who consents to the use of samples from children. In this paper, we discuss the scope of parental consent. This scope has a temporal dimension and one related to the content of consent. It is not questioned that the temporal scope of parental consent is limited and that young adults have the right to decide on the fate of their samples when they reach the age of maturity. With regard to the content of consent, the question remains whether parents are allowed to give full broad consent to any possible future research on the samples of their children. We argue that they should not be allowed to do so, based on two premises. First, it is generally acknowledged that children have a right to express their own values and that they should be given the opportunity to develop their own autonomy as they grow older. Second, research and science are not completely value-free and some types of research may be more sensitive than other types. Children should be given the opportunity to express their values also in this respect.

摘要

利用儿童储存的组织样本进行遗传研究引发了一些特定的伦理问题,这些问题与涉及成年参与者的问题并不完全类似。其中包括同意的问题,因为通常是父母同意使用儿童的样本。在本文中,我们讨论了父母同意的范围。这个范围具有时间维度和与同意内容相关的维度。父母同意的时间范围是有限的,当年轻人达到成年年龄时,有权决定他们样本的命运,这一点是毋庸置疑的。至于同意的内容,问题仍然是父母是否被允许对其子女样本的任何未来研究给予全面的同意。我们认为,不应该允许他们这样做,这基于两个前提。首先,人们普遍承认,儿童有权表达自己的价值观,并且应该随着年龄的增长有机会发展自己的自主权。其次,研究和科学并非完全没有价值,某些类型的研究可能比其他类型更为敏感。儿童也应该有机会在这方面表达他们的价值观。

相似文献

1
Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul;19(7):735-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Sep;23(9):1129-34. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.267. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Paediatric biobanks: what makes them so unique?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Feb;48(2):E1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02072.x. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
6
Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):128-142. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1505783. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Research Consent at the Age of Majority: Preferable but not Obligatory.
Pediatrics. 2018 Aug;142(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3038. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
[The ethical implications of conserving biological samples].
J Int Bioethique. 2009 Sep;20(3):87-96, 150-1. doi: 10.3917/jib.203.0087.

引用本文的文献

2
Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;183(10):4195-4203. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05687-0. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
5
Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data.
J Med Ethics. 2023 Feb;49(2):106-109. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107958. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Dec 13;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00117-7.
7
8
Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00446-3. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):307-317. doi: 10.1177/1556264619866991. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0683-x.

本文引用的文献

2
Need for a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research.
BMJ. 2010 May 5;340:c2335. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2335.
3
The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):68-76. doi: 10.1159/000294185. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
4
Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):741-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.30. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
6
Biobanks: oversight offers protection.
Science. 2009 Nov 6;326(5954):798-9; author reply 799. doi: 10.1126/science.326_798c.
7
Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2128-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.157099. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
8
Genetic research on stored tissue samples from minors: a systematic review of the ethical literature.
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Oct;149A(10):2346-58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33032.
9
Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.
Science. 2009 Aug 14;325(5942):818-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1173284.
10
Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up.
J Pediatr. 2009 Oct;155(4):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.034.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验