• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激前活动预测自上而下与自下而上注意选择的获胜者。

Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.

机构信息

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e16243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016243.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0016243
PMID:21386896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3046127/
Abstract

Our ability to process visual information is fundamentally limited. This leads to competition between sensory information that is relevant for top-down goals and sensory information that is perceptually salient, but task-irrelevant. The aim of the present study was to identify, from EEG recordings, pre-stimulus and pre-saccadic neural activity that could predict whether top-down or bottom-up processes would win the competition for attention on a trial-by-trial basis. We employed a visual search paradigm in which a lateralized low contrast target appeared alone, or with a low (i.e., non-salient) or high contrast (i.e., salient) distractor. Trials with a salient distractor were of primary interest due to the strong competition between top-down knowledge and bottom-up attentional capture. Our results demonstrated that 1) in the 1-sec pre-stimulus interval, frontal alpha (8-12 Hz) activity was higher on trials where the salient distractor captured attention and the first saccade (bottom-up win); and 2) there was a transient pre-saccadic increase in posterior-parietal alpha (7-8 Hz) activity on trials where the first saccade went to the target (top-down win). We propose that the high frontal alpha reflects a disengagement of attentional control whereas the transient posterior alpha time-locked to the saccade indicates sensory inhibition of the salient distractor and suppression of bottom-up oculomotor capture.

摘要

我们处理视觉信息的能力从根本上受到限制。这导致了与自上而下的目标相关的感觉信息与感知上显著但任务无关的感觉信息之间的竞争。本研究的目的是从 EEG 记录中识别出能够预测在逐次试验中自上而下或自下而上的过程将赢得注意力竞争的预刺激和预眼跳前的神经活动。我们采用了一种视觉搜索范式,其中一个侧化的低对比度目标单独出现,或者与一个低(即非显著)或高对比度(即显著)的分心物一起出现。由于自上而下的知识和自下而上的注意力捕获之间存在强烈的竞争,因此具有显著分心物的试验是主要关注的对象。我们的结果表明:1)在前 1 秒的预刺激间隔内,在显著的分心物吸引注意力和第一次眼跳(自下而上获胜)的试验中,额部 alpha(8-12 Hz)活动更高;2)在第一次眼跳指向目标的试验中(自上而下获胜),后顶叶 alpha(7-8 Hz)活动出现短暂的预眼跳增加。我们提出,高额 alpha 反映了注意力控制的脱离,而与眼跳时间锁定的短暂的后顶叶 alpha 则表明对显著分心物的感觉抑制和对自下而上的眼球运动捕获的抑制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/bbc7a93d714c/pone.0016243.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/2527dd7d31a1/pone.0016243.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/be5be94f269a/pone.0016243.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/f533119341fc/pone.0016243.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/bbc7a93d714c/pone.0016243.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/2527dd7d31a1/pone.0016243.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/be5be94f269a/pone.0016243.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/f533119341fc/pone.0016243.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5e/3046127/bbc7a93d714c/pone.0016243.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.刺激前活动预测自上而下与自下而上注意选择的获胜者。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e16243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016243.
2
Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.由感知上显著的非目标引起的注意捕获通过抑制和快速排除促进目标处理。
J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):5. doi: 10.1167/10.6.5.
3
Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets.相关和不相关起始对眼睛的吸引。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(2):225-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1226-3. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
4
Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement.眼球运动捕获和脱离控制的分离证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(4):621-31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1. Epub 2010 Dec 25.
5
Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.目标干扰物相似度对扫视偏差的早期和晚期调节
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1451-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00068.2009. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
6
Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.注意捕获由显著干扰物在视觉搜索期间由时间任务需求决定。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):749-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
7
Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.对扫视目标选择的早期自上而下控制:来自系统显著性差异操纵的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):367-82. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0592-0.
8
Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.双额经颅直流电刺激对视觉注意中目标位置和分心物显著性相互作用的极性依赖性影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;30(6):851-866. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01242. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.逐试调整自上而下的定势调节眼球运动捕获。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):897-903. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0118-5.
10
Visual attention and eye movement control during oculomotor competition.眼球运动竞争中的视觉注意和眼球运动控制。
J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.9.16.

引用本文的文献

1
10 Hz rhythmic stimulation modulates electrophysiological, but not behavioral markers of suppression.10赫兹节律性刺激调节电生理指标,但不调节抑制的行为指标。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 20;15:1376664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1376664. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing Trial-by-Trial Electrophysiological and Behavioral Markers of Attentional Control and Sensory Precision in Psychotic and Mood Disorders.评估精神病性和情绪障碍中注意控制及感觉精度的逐次试验电生理和行为标志物
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 14;51(2):543-555. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae038.
3
A new perspective on the role of the frontoparietal regions in Stroop-like conflicts.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.由感知上显著的非目标引起的注意捕获通过抑制和快速排除促进目标处理。
J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):5. doi: 10.1167/10.6.5.
2
Distraction and target selection in the brain: an fMRI study.大脑中的分心和目标选择:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.019. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
3
Functional disconnection of frontal cortex and visual cortex in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
从前额顶叶区域在类 Stroop 冲突中的作用看新视角。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Aug 1;44(11):4310-4320. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26347. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Electrophysiological and behavioral correlates of cannabis use disorder.大麻使用障碍的电生理和行为相关性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec;22(6):1421-1431. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01016-w. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.没有证据表明存在主动抑制明确提示分心特征的现象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1338-1346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Global, Low-Amplitude Cortical State Predicts Response Outcomes in a Selective Detection Task in Mice.全球、低振幅皮质状态预测小鼠选择性检测任务中的反应结果。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Apr 20;32(9):2037-2053. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab339.
7
Baseline Differences in Anxiety Affect Attention and tDCS-Mediated Learning.焦虑的基线差异影响注意力和经颅直流电刺激介导的学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 3;15:541369. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.541369. eCollection 2021.
8
Visual search under physical effort is faster but more vulnerable to distractor interference.在体力劳动下进行视觉搜索会更快,但更容易受到干扰。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 12;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00283-4.
9
The Weakened Relationship Between Prestimulus Alpha Oscillations and Response Time in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍老年人刺激前α振荡与反应时间之间的关系减弱
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:48. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00048. eCollection 2020.
10
Loss-of-function mutation in inositol monophosphatase 1 (IMPA1) results in abnormal synchrony in resting-state EEG.肌醇单磷酸酶 1(IMPA1)的功能丧失性突变导致静息状态 EEG 的异常同步。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0977-1.
注意缺陷多动障碍患者前额叶皮质和视觉皮质的功能连接中断。
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr 1;67(7):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
4
Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations.在视觉搜索过程中,注意力的连续、隐蔽转移由额叶眼区反映出来,并与群体振荡相关。
Neuron. 2009 Aug 13;63(3):386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.020.
5
Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses.刺激前的阿尔法和缪活动预示着抑制运动反应的失败。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jun;30(6):1791-800. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20763.
6
Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience.顶内沟前部对由刺激显著性驱动的自下而上的注意力敏感。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1584-601. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21103.
7
Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex.自发性局部受限脑电图α活动决定运动皮层的皮质兴奋性。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.021. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
8
Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex.注意力在人类视觉皮层中并行促进多种刺激特征。
Curr Biol. 2008 Jul 8;18(13):1006-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.030.
9
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind.人类大脑的重新定向系统:从环境到心理理论
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.
10
Prestimulus cortical activity is correlated with speed of visuomotor processing.刺激前皮层活动与视觉运动处理速度相关。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Oct;20(10):1915-25. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20132.