• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有证据表明存在主动抑制明确提示分心特征的现象。

No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.

机构信息

Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1338-1346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7
PMID:35318583
Abstract

Visual search benefits from advance knowledge of nontarget features. However, it is unknown whether these negatively cued features are suppressed in advance (proactively) or during search (reactively). To test this, we presented color cues varying from trial-to-trial that predicted target or nontarget colors. Experiment 1 (N = 96) showed that both target and nontarget cues speeded search. To test whether attention proactively modified cued feature representations, in Experiment 2 (N = 200), we interleaved color probe and search trials and had participants detect the color of a briefly presented ring that could either match the cued color or not. People detected positively cued colors better than other colors, whereas negatively cued colors were detected no better or worse than other colors. These results demonstrate that nontarget features are not suppressed proactively, and instead suggest that anticipated nontarget features are ignored via reactive mechanisms.

摘要

视觉搜索得益于对非目标特征的预先了解。然而,目前尚不清楚这些负面提示特征是预先(主动地)还是在搜索过程中(被动地)被抑制。为了检验这一点,我们在试验间呈现了各种颜色提示,这些提示预测了目标或非目标的颜色。实验 1(N = 96)表明,目标和非目标提示都能加速搜索。为了检验注意力是否主动地修改了提示特征的表示,在实验 2(N = 200)中,我们交错呈现颜色探针和搜索试验,并要求参与者检测一个短暂呈现的圆环的颜色,该圆环的颜色可以与提示的颜色匹配,也可以不匹配。人们对正提示的颜色的检测要好于其他颜色,而对负提示的颜色的检测并不比其他颜色好或差。这些结果表明,非目标特征不会被主动抑制,而是表明预期的非目标特征是通过被动机制被忽略的。

相似文献

1
No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.没有证据表明存在主动抑制明确提示分心特征的现象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1338-1346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.视觉搜索中对多个特征的习得性和线索性干扰项抑制
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):359-376. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1622-8.
3
Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.主动抑制是一种内隐过程,不能按需唤起。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Jun;50(6):636-653. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001206. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Evidence for top-down suppression of negative features in the target feature dimension.目标特征维度中自上而下抑制负面特征的证据。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105415. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105415. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
5
Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued.分心物忽略在偶然学习时与目标增强一样有效,但在明确提示时则不然。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):834-844. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02588-y. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.忽视悖论:提示干扰特征首先会导致选择,然后会抑制要被忽视的项目。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1590-605. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0.
7
Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.基于特征的注意控制对分心物的抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1075-1085. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02858-x. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?显著的突然发作会引发抑制吗?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):634-648. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02578-0. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.负线索最小化视觉搜索特异性效应。
Vision Res. 2022 Jul;196:108030. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108030. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
10
The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.视觉搜索过程中基于模板的注意力引导以进行排除。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan;83(1):38-57. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02191-z. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.信号抑制2.0:注意捕获与抑制的最新阐述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02736-z.
2
The consequences of preparing for informative or distracting stimuli.为信息性或干扰性刺激做准备的后果。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02476-z.
3
Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.习得性干扰项排除:稳健但速度惊人。

本文引用的文献

1
Distractor ignoring: strategies, learning, and passive filtering.干扰项忽略:策略、学习与被动过滤
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;28(6):600-606. doi: 10.1177/0963721419867099. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.增强和抑制灵活引导注意力。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec;30(12):1724-1732. doi: 10.1177/0956797619878813. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.准备视觉分心的波动机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1132-1149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03051-4. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression.分离线索和 Alpha 相关机制以抑制分心物。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 19;44(25):e1444232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1444-23.2024.
5
Distinct mechanisms of attentional suppression: exploration of trait factors underlying cued- and learned-suppression.注意抑制的不同机制:探究线索抑制和习得性抑制的特质因素基础。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 1;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00554-w.
6
Sequential encoding aids working memory for meaningful objects' identities but not for their colors.连续编码有助于工作记忆对有意义物体的身份进行编码,但不能对其颜色进行编码。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):2119-2131. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01486-4. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
Contextual and Temporal Constraints for Attentional Capture: Commentary on Theeuwes' 2023 Review "The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We Avoid Salient Distractors and when Not?".注意捕获的情境和时间限制:对特乌韦斯2023年综述《注意捕获之争:何时我们能够避免显著干扰物以及何时不能?》的评论
J Cogn. 2023 Jul 6;6(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.274. eCollection 2023.
8
Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control.负向和正向模板:两种形式的提示性注意控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):585-595. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02590-4. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression.十条简单规则学习抑制分心物。
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Jun;213:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102269. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1873-1894. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01460. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
No evidence for enhanced distractor template representation in early visual cortex.早期视觉皮层中不存在干扰物模板表征增强的证据。
Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.无论你做什么,都不要看……:通过排除性注意模板评估引导
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):645-662. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000485. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.驯服白熊:分心抑制的初始成本和最终收益。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):476-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797615626564. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Feature-based attention elicits surround suppression in feature space.基于特征的注意力在特征空间中引发外周抑制。
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 8;24(17):1985-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.030. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Perceptual consequences of feature-based attentional enhancement and suppression.基于特征的注意力增强和抑制的感知后果。
J Vis. 2012 Aug 24;12(8):15. doi: 10.1167/12.8.15.
9
Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.拒绝模板:配置注意力以忽略任务不相关的特征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
10
Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.刺激前活动预测自上而下与自下而上注意选择的获胜者。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e16243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016243.