Suppr超能文献

使用 GRADE 评估证据质量和推荐强度。

Rating the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using GRADE.

机构信息

Division of Urology, UT Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin St. MSB 6.018, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2011 Jun;29(3):311-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0667-2. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Urologists can benefit from a standardized system for guideline development and presentation. This article introduces the GRADE system and explains how it may be useful for Urologic physicians, in their practice and in their healthcare systems.

METHODS

The GRADE system is reviewed. Specific aspects of how GRADE rates the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations are explored.

RESULTS

GRADE can provide explicit and structured guidance, which separates the quality of evidence from the strength of recommendations. This information can be used by consumers of guidelines, including patients, physicians, and policy makers.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologists can benefit from a more transparent and rigorous framework when formulating recommendations. GRADE is an emergent proposal with broader implications for healthcare policy as well.

摘要

目的

泌尿科医生可以从指南制定和呈现的标准化系统中受益。本文介绍了 GRADE 系统,并解释了它如何对泌尿科医生的实践和医疗体系有用。

方法

对 GRADE 系统进行了回顾。探讨了 GRADE 如何评定证据质量和推荐强度的具体方面。

结果

GRADE 可以提供明确和结构化的指导,将证据质量与推荐强度分开。指南的使用者,包括患者、医生和决策者,可以使用这些信息。

结论

泌尿科医生在制定建议时可以从更透明和严格的框架中受益。GRADE 是一个新兴的提议,对医疗保健政策也有更广泛的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验