Kulish Nancy
Department of Psychiatry, Wayne State Medical School, USA.
Psychoanal Q. 2011 Jan;80(1):3-32. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2011.tb00075.x.
Many new theoretical and technical developments have extended our understandings of triangular conflicts in the psychoanalytic setting. Yet until recently psychoanalysis has lacked theoretical concepts for passion and, most particularly, for oedipal passion. Contemporary psychoanalytic understandings of the nature of oedipal passion help explain why it is both difficult to articulate and why it continues to be "forgotten". The author argues that individual resistances to oedipal passions reappear and are reinforced in collective theories that distance us from oedipal issues. She presents two clinical cases that illustrate enactments around, and resistances to, oedipal passions within both analyst and patient.
许多新的理论和技术发展拓展了我们对精神分析情境中三角冲突的理解。然而，直到最近，精神分析仍缺乏关于激情，尤其是俄狄浦斯激情的理论概念。当代对俄狄浦斯激情本质的精神分析理解有助于解释为何它既难以阐明，又为何持续被“遗忘”。作者认为，个体对俄狄浦斯激情的抗拒会在使我们远离俄狄浦斯问题的集体理论中再次出现并得到强化。她呈现了两个临床案例，展示了分析师和患者围绕俄狄浦斯激情的行为表现及对其的抗拒。
