Suppr超能文献

木蚁的战斗策略:小群体中的个体战斗更激烈,但死亡更快。

Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.

机构信息

Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3243-50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0062. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Abstract

When social animals engage in inter-group contests, the outcome is determined by group sizes and individual masses, which together determine group resource-holding potential ('group RHP'). Individuals that perceive themselves as being in a group with high RHP may receive a motivational increase and increase their aggression levels. Alternatively, individuals in lower RHP groups may increase their aggression levels in an attempt to overcome the RHP deficit. We investigate how 'group RHP' influences agonistic tactics in red wood ants Formica rufa. Larger groups had higher total agonistic indices, but per capita agonistic indices were highest in the smallest groups, indicating that individuals in smaller groups fought harder. Agonistic indices were influenced by relative mean mass, focal group size, opponent group size and opponent group agonistic index. Focal group attrition rates decreased as focal group relative agonistic indices increased and there was a strong negative influence of relative mean mass. The highest focal attrition rates were received when opponent groups were numerically large and composed of large individuals. Thus, fight tactics in F. rufa seem to vary with both aspects of group RHP, group size and the individual attributes of group members, indicating that information on these are available to fighting ants.

摘要

当社会性动物参与群体间竞争时,结果取决于群体大小和个体质量,这两者共同决定了群体资源持有潜力(“群体 RHP”)。那些认为自己所在群体 RHP 较高的个体可能会受到激励,增加攻击性。或者,低 RHP 群体的个体可能会增加攻击性,试图弥补 RHP 不足。我们研究了“群体 RHP”如何影响红褐林蚁 Formica rufa 的攻击策略。较大的群体总攻击指数较高,但最小群体的人均攻击指数最高,这表明较小群体中的个体战斗更激烈。攻击指数受相对平均质量、焦点群体大小、对手群体大小和对手群体攻击指数的影响。随着焦点群体相对攻击指数的增加,焦点群体的损耗率下降,而相对平均质量的影响则很强。当对手群体数量庞大且由大型个体组成时,焦点群体的损耗率最高。因此,红褐林蚁的战斗策略似乎随群体 RHP 的两个方面、群体大小以及群体成员的个体属性而变化,这表明战斗蚂蚁可以获得这些信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Lethal combats in the forest among wild western gorillas.野生西部大猩猩在森林中的致命搏斗。
iScience. 2024 Mar 6;27(4):109437. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109437. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
6
A positive effect of cumulative intergroup threat on reproductive success.累积的群体间威胁对生殖成功有积极影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 29;290(2011):20231853. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1853. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
Fitness consequences of outgroup conflict.异族冲突的适应后果。
Elife. 2022 Jul 14;11:e74550. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74550.

本文引用的文献

3
Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation.领地蝴蝶的竞争结果:动机的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):3027-33. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0646. Epub 2010 May 12.
5
Experience influences aggressive behaviour in the Argentine ant.经验会影响阿根廷蚂蚁的侵略行为。
Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):152-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0616. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验