• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验会影响对抗性竞争的结果,但不会影响体型的选择优势。

Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size.

作者信息

Kasumovic Michael M, Elias Damian O, Punzalan David, Mason Andrew C, Andrade Maydianne C B

机构信息

Integrative Behaviour and Neuroscience Group, University of Toronto, Scarborough, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Anim Behav. 2009 Jun;77(6):1533-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.026
PMID:20161296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2699276/
Abstract

In the field, phenotypic determinants of competitive success are not always absolute. For example, contest experience may alter future competitive performance. As future contests are not determined solely on phenotypic attributes, prior experience could also potentially alter phenotype-fitness associations. In this study, we examined the influence of single and multiple experiences on contest outcomes in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus. We also examined whether phenotype-fitness associations altered as individuals gained more experience. Using both size-matched contests and a tournament design, we found that both winning and losing experience affected future contest success; males with prior winning experience were more likely to win subsequent contests. Although experience was a significant determinant of success in future contests, male weight was approximately 1.3 times more important than experience in predicting contest outcomes. Despite the importance of experience in determining contest outcomes, patterns of selection did not change between rounds. Overall, our results show that experience can be an important determinant in contest outcomes, even in short-lived invertebrates, and that experience alone is unlikely to alter phenotype-fitness associations.

摘要

在野外,竞争成功的表型决定因素并非总是绝对的。例如,争斗经验可能会改变未来的竞争表现。由于未来的争斗并非仅由表型属性决定,先前的经验也可能会改变表型与适合度之间的关联。在本研究中,我们考察了单次和多次经验对跳蛛(Phidippus clarus)争斗结果的影响。我们还研究了随着个体获得更多经验,表型与适合度之间的关联是否会发生变化。通过使用体型匹配的争斗和锦标赛设计,我们发现获胜和失败的经验都会影响未来争斗的成功;有先前获胜经验的雄性更有可能赢得后续争斗。尽管经验是未来争斗成功的一个重要决定因素,但在预测争斗结果时,雄性体重的重要性约为经验的1.3倍。尽管经验在决定争斗结果方面很重要,但各轮之间的选择模式并未改变。总体而言,我们的结果表明,经验可能是争斗结果的一个重要决定因素,即使在寿命较短的无脊椎动物中也是如此,而且仅靠经验不太可能改变表型与适合度之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size.经验会影响对抗性竞争的结果,但不会影响体型的选择优势。
Anim Behav. 2009 Jun;77(6):1533-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.026.
2
Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.战斗经验对攻击性行为的调节:机制与竞争结果
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74. doi: 10.1017/S146479310500686X.
3
Contest experience and body size affect different types of contest decisions.竞赛经验和体型会影响不同类型的竞赛决策。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1028-8. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
4
Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects.对先前竞赛经历以及胜者和败者效应的持续性进行考察。
Behav Ecol. 2010 Mar;21(2):404-409. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp204. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
5
Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects.先前的竞赛经验对后续的胜利者和失败者效应产生长期影响。
Front Zool. 2011 Nov 3;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-28.
6
The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences.胜者与败者效应:整合多种经历
Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):903-910. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049.
7
Effects of Prior Contest Experience and Contest Outcome on Female Reproductive Decisions and Offspring Fitness.先前竞赛经历和竞赛结果对雌性生殖决策及后代健康的影响。
Am Nat. 2016 Sep;188(3):319-28. doi: 10.1086/687392. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders.雄性跳蛛激烈争斗期间的评估。
Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):901-910. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.032.
9
Winner-loser effects overrule aggressiveness during the early stages of contests between pigs.在猪之间竞争的早期阶段,胜负效应会压倒攻击性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69664-x.
10
Outcomes of agonistic interactions alter sheltering behavior in crayfish.竞争行为的结果会改变淡水小龙虾的遮蔽行为。
Behav Processes. 2021 Mar;184:104337. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104337. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior mating success can affect allocation towards future sexual signaling in crickets.先前的交配成功会影响蟋蟀未来的性信号分配。
PeerJ. 2014 Nov 4;2:e657. doi: 10.7717/peerj.657. eCollection 2014.
2
Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects.对先前竞赛经历以及胜者和败者效应的持续性进行考察。
Behav Ecol. 2010 Mar;21(2):404-409. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp204. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
3
The ghost of social environments past: dominance relationships include current interactions and experience carried over from previous groups.社会环境的幽灵:支配关系包括当前的互动以及从前一组带来的经验。
Biol Lett. 2011 Dec 23;7(6):818-21. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0325. Epub 2011 May 11.
4
Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.木蚁的战斗策略:小群体中的个体战斗更激烈,但死亡更快。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3243-50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0062. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS: BIASES DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCES BETWEEN TRAITS AND FITNESS.数量性状选择的测量:性状与适合度之间环境协方差导致的偏差
Evolution. 1992 Jun;46(3):616-626. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02070.x.
2
REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION.自然选择的回归分析:统计推断与生物学解释
Evolution. 1987 Nov;41(6):1149-1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb02457.x.
3
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.对相关性状选择的度量
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x.
4
Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders.雄性跳蛛激烈争斗期间的评估。
Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):901-910. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.032.
5
Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing?使用二次回归系数估计非线性选择梯度:加倍还是全无?
Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2435-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00449.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
6
Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctuations in sexual selection.空间和时间上的人口统计学变化驱动了性选择在季节内的波动。
Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2316-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00446.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
7
Reciprocity between endocrine state and contest behavior in the killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus.食蚊鱼(Kryptolebias marmoratus)内分泌状态与竞争行为之间的相互关系。
Horm Behav. 2008 Mar;53(3):442-51. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.11.017. Epub 2007 Dec 8.
8
Plasticity in animal personality traits: does prior experience alter the degree of boldness?动物个性特征的可塑性:先前的经历会改变其大胆程度吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):333-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3751.
9
What sets the odds of winning and losing?是什么决定了输赢的几率?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jan;21(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.014. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
10
Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles: extension or innovation?捕食者诱导的蝌蚪表型可塑性:扩展还是创新?
J Evol Biol. 2006 Mar;19(2):450-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01015.x.