Suppr超能文献

印度南部的污名与社会参与:麻风病患者和艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者之间的差异和共同点。

Stigma and social participation in Southern India: differences and commonalities among persons affected by leprosy and persons living with HIV/AIDS.

机构信息

VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Health Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):695-707. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.555945. Epub 2011 May 24.

Abstract

Stigma is a common phenomenon worldwide and infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS and leprosy are often associated with high levels of stigma. Several studies have been conducted concerning the effects of stigma and the impact on social participation, but comparative studies are rare. The objective of this study was to identify differences and similarities between HIV/AIDS and leprosy-related stigma. From April till July 2009, 190 questionnaire-based interviews were conducted to assess the levels of internalized stigma (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale), perceived stigma (Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue stigma scale) and social participation (Participation scale) in a cross-sectional sample of people affected by leprosy (PL) and people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA). Respondents were selected from several hospitals, charity projects and during home visits in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu. Our results showed that both PLHA (n = 95) and leprosy-affected respondents (n = 95) faced a substantial burden of internalized and perceived stigma, with the former reporting a significantly higher level of stigma. As a result, PLHA faced more frequent and also more severe participation restrictions than PL. Especially, restrictions in work-related areas were reported by the majority of the respondents. In conclusion, PLHA faced a significantly higher level of stigma and participation restriction than PL. However, the latter also reported a substantial burden of stigma and participation restrictions. The study suggests that it may be possible to develop joint interventions based on the commonalities found. More research is needed to define these more precisely and to test the effectiveness of such joint interventions in reducing stigma and improving social participation.

摘要

污名是一个普遍存在于全球的现象,像艾滋病和麻风病这样的传染病往往与高度污名化有关。已经有许多关于污名化的影响及其对社会参与的影响的研究,但比较研究很少。本研究的目的是确定艾滋病相关的污名和麻风病相关的污名之间的差异和相似之处。在 2009 年 4 月至 7 月期间,对 190 名基于问卷调查的访谈进行了调查,以评估受麻风病影响的人和艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者(PLHA)这两个群体的内化污名(精神疾病内化污名量表)、感知污名(解释模型访谈目录污名量表)和社会参与(参与量表)水平。受访者是从泰米尔纳德邦维洛尔区的几家医院、慈善项目和家访中挑选出来的。我们的研究结果表明,PLHA(n=95)和受麻风病影响的受访者(n=95)都面临着严重的内化和感知污名负担,前者报告的污名程度明显更高。因此,PLHA 面临的参与限制比 PL 更频繁和更严重。特别是,大多数受访者报告在与工作相关的领域受到限制。总之,PLHA 面临的污名和参与限制比 PL 高得多。然而,后者也报告了相当大的污名和参与限制负担。该研究表明,可能可以根据发现的共同点制定联合干预措施。需要更多的研究来更准确地定义这些共同点,并测试这种联合干预措施在减少污名和改善社会参与方面的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验