Dijkstra Janna I R, van Elteren Marianne, Banstola Nand Lal, Shakya Labhi, Sigdel Himalaya, van Brakel Wim H
Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NLR Nepal, Biratnagar, Nepal.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 25;4(1):e0002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002654. eCollection 2024.
To assess mental wellbeing among persons affected by leprosy, this study aimed to validate the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, depression tool) in Province 1 and 7, Nepal. Using purposive and convenience sampling, cross-cultural equivalences were assessed through semi-structured interviews with persons affected by leprosy (>18 years). Data were transcribed, translated, analysed and discussed with experts before revising the tools. Psychometric properties of the scales were assessed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire with cases affected by leprosy and controls not affected by leprosy (>18 years). Statistical analysis included internal consistency, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability. The qualitative study included 20 respondents of whom eleven were female. The statements in the original tools were rephrased to questions as participants had difficulties understanding the statements. Six additional changes were made to ensure items were understood well. The quantitative study included 90 cases (46% female) and 50 controls (54% female). The WEMWBS and PHQ-9 had adequate psychometric properties. Cronbach's alphas were 0.85 and 0.76, respectively, indicating good internal consistency, 75% of hypotheses for construct validity were confirmed, no floor and ceiling effects were found, and data to help users interpret results are presented. Our study provides evidence that the adapted versions of the WEMWBS and PHQ-9 have good cultural validity to measure mental wellbeing and depression among persons affected by leprosy in Province 1 and 7, Nepal.
为评估麻风病患者的心理健康状况,本研究旨在验证尼泊尔第1省和第7省的沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)和患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9,抑郁工具)。采用立意抽样和便利抽样方法,通过对18岁以上麻风病患者进行半结构化访谈来评估跨文化等效性。在修订工具之前,对数据进行转录、翻译、分析并与专家进行讨论。使用访谈员 administered 问卷对麻风病患者和未患麻风病的对照者(18岁以上)评估量表的心理测量特性。统计分析包括内部一致性、结构效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及可解释性。定性研究包括20名受访者,其中11名是女性。由于参与者难以理解原始工具中的陈述,因此将其重新表述为问题。还进行了六项额外更改以确保项目易于理解。定量研究包括90例患者(46%为女性)和50名对照者(54%为女性)。WEMWBS和PHQ - 9具有足够的心理测量特性。Cronbach's 阿尔法系数分别为0.85和0.76,表明内部一致性良好,75%的结构效度假设得到证实,未发现地板效应和天花板效应,并提供了帮助用户解释结果的数据。我们的研究提供了证据,表明WEMWBS和PHQ - 9的改编版本在测量尼泊尔第1省和第7省麻风病患者的心理健康和抑郁方面具有良好的文化效度。 (注:“interviewer-administered”这里可能有误,推测应该是“interviewer - administered”,意为“由访谈员实施的” )