Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;46(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0174-6.
The ‘recovery approach’ to the management of severe mental health problems has become a guiding vision of service provision amongst many practitioners, researchers, and policy makers as well as service users.
This qualitative pilot study explored the meaning of ‘recovery’ with users of three specialist mental health services (eating disorders, dual diagnosis, and forensic) in 18 semi-structured interviews.
The relevance of themes identified in mainstream recovery literature was confirmed; however, the interpretation and relative weight of these themes appeared to be affected by factors that were specific to the diagnosis and treatment context. ‘Clinical’ recovery themes were also seen as important, as were aspects of care that reflect core human values, such as kindness.
对于严重精神健康问题的管理，“康复方法”已经成为许多从业者、研究人员、政策制定者以及服务使用者的指导愿景。
本定性试点研究通过 18 次半结构化访谈，探讨了三种专业精神健康服务（饮食失调、双重诊断和法医）使用者对“康复”的理解。
主流康复文献中确定的主题相关性得到了确认；然而，这些主题的解释和相对重要性似乎受到了特定于诊断和治疗背景的因素的影响。“临床”康复主题也被认为很重要，反映了核心人类价值观的护理方面也很重要，例如善良。
