Suppr超能文献

无抗凝剂替代诱饵产品对家鼠(小家鼠)和褐家鼠(褐鼠)的效果。

Efficacy of anticoagulant-free alternative bait products against house mice (Mus musculus) and brown rats (Rattus norvegicus).

作者信息

Schmolz Erik

机构信息

Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Integr Zool. 2010 Mar;5(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00191.x.

Abstract

The attractiveness and efficacy of four anonymous anticoagulant-free alternative rodenticides (active ingredients cellulose or plaster) were tested on wild strain groups of house mice (Mus musculus Linnaeus) and brown rats (Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout) in laboratory choice and no-choice experiments. In no-choice tests, the rodenticide product was offered ad libitum to the animals for 21 days (mice) and 10 days (rats), respectively. In choice tests, the rodenticide product and non-poisoned food were offered for 28 days (mice) and 14 days (rats). Two products with cellulose (C1 and C2) as the active ingredient were tested against both mice and rats. In two no-choice tests with mice, all animals died within 14 days (C1) and 21 days (C2); in a third no-choice test, 11% (2/18) of mice survived (C1: 21 days). In all three tests, numerous incidents of cannibalism were observed. The attractiveness of cellulose baits was tested for one product (C1) in three trials against normal food pellets. In all trials, bait consumption was low and all mice survived (15-34 days). Two no-choice trials with cellulose baits (C1) were conducted on groups of Rattus norvegicus; 11 of 12 rats survived the bait feeding period and no cannibalism or sign of aggression between conspecifics was observed. Two plaster-based (CaSO4 0.5H2O) products (P1 and P2) were tested against both mice and rats; in no-choice tests, only one mouse (n= 20) and no rats (n= 8) were killed, although the baits proved to be attractive for rats and mice in choice tests. The results of these experiments suggest that neither cellulose-based nor plaster-based rodenticides are suitable agents for the control of Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus.

摘要

在实验室的选择和无选择实验中,对野生家鼠(小家鼠,林奈)和褐家鼠(褐家鼠,贝肯豪特)品系组测试了四种无抗凝剂的替代灭鼠剂(活性成分纤维素或石膏)的吸引力和效果。在无选择试验中,分别向动物随意提供灭鼠剂产品21天(小鼠)和10天(大鼠)。在选择试验中,提供灭鼠剂产品和无毒食物28天(小鼠)和14天(大鼠)。测试了两种以纤维素(C1和C2)为活性成分的产品对小鼠和大鼠的效果。在两项对小鼠的无选择试验中,所有动物在14天(C1)和21天(C2)内死亡;在第三次无选择试验中,11%(2/18)的小鼠存活(C1:21天)。在所有三项试验中,均观察到大量同类相食事件。针对一种产品(C1),在三项试验中测试了纤维素诱饵相对于正常食物颗粒的吸引力。在所有试验中,诱饵消耗量低,所有小鼠存活(15 - 34天)。对褐家鼠组进行了两项使用纤维素诱饵(C1)的无选择试验;12只大鼠中有11只在诱饵投喂期存活,未观察到同类相食或同种间攻击迹象。测试了两种以石膏(CaSO4·0.5H2O)为基础的产品(P1和P2)对小鼠和大鼠 的效果;在无选择试验中,仅一只小鼠(n = 20)死亡,大鼠无一死亡(n = 8),尽管诱饵在选择试验中对大鼠和小鼠具有吸引力。这些实验结果表明,基于纤维素和基于石膏的灭鼠剂都不是控制小家鼠和褐家鼠的合适药剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验