Suppr超能文献

固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合的长期咬合及软组织侧貌变化。

Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.

机构信息

Lothian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Orthodontics, Edinburgh University Postgraduate Dental Institute, Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.035.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to determine which factors were predictive of good long-term outcomes after fixed appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.

METHODS

Two hundred seven patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion were examined in early adulthood at a mean of 4.6 years after treatment with fixed appliances. The peer assessment rating index was used to evaluate dental alignment and occlusal relationships. The soft-tissue profile was assessed with the Holdaway angle.

RESULTS

Logistic regression identified 3 pretreatment variables that were predictive of a good facial profile (Holdaway angle) at recall: the lower lip to E-plane distance (P <0.001; smaller distance behind the E-plane means a better outcome), ANB angle (P = 0.001; smaller ANB means a better outcome), and extraction pattern (P = 0.026). Linear regression analysis showed that 2 pretreatment variables were predictive of a favorable PAR score at recall: SNB angle (P = 0.001; larger SNB means a better outcome) and extraction pattern (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Three pretreatment cephalometric measures (lower lip to E-plane distance, ANB angle, and SNB angle) were predictive of the outcome in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. The extraction pattern was also found to be a predictor of outcome.

摘要

简介

我们的目的是确定哪些因素对固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合的长期预后有预测作用。

方法

207 例安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合患者,于矫治固定矫治器后平均 4.6 年的成年早期进行检查。采用同行评估分级指数评价牙列及咬合关系的整齐度,Holdaway 角评价软组织侧貌。

结果

逻辑回归分析确定了 3 个治疗前变量可预测随访时的良好面型(Holdaway 角):下唇至 E 平面距离(P<0.001;E 平面后距离越小,结果越好)、ANB 角(P=0.001;ANB 角越小,结果越好)和拔牙模式(P=0.026)。线性回归分析显示,2 个治疗前的头影测量指标可预测随访时的 PAR 评分:SNB 角(P=0.001;SNB 角越大,结果越好)和拔牙模式(P=0.034)。

结论

3 个治疗前的头影测量指标(下唇至 E 平面距离、ANB 角和 SNB 角)可预测安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合的治疗结果。拔牙模式也是结果的预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验