Suppr超能文献

安氏I类错颌患者正畸治疗拔牙与非拔牙后软组织面部轮廓变化的比较研究

Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with or without tooth extractions in Class I malocclusion patients: A comparative study.

作者信息

Freitas Benedito V, Rodrigues Vandilson P, Rodrigues Mariana F, de Melo Heloiza V F, Dos Santos Pedro C F

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.

Dentistry Graduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the soft tissue facial profile changes in Class I malocclusion patients after orthodontic treatment with or without tooth extraction.

METHODS

Forty lateral cephalograms of 20 individuals with Angle Class I malocclusion submitted to orthodontic treatment were included in this study. The individuals were divided in two groups: no tooth extraction (Group A) and extraction of four first premolars (Group B). Cephalometric measurements related to the soft tissue facial profile (Nasolabial Angle, Mentolabial Angle, Interlabial Angle, Facial Convexity Angle, Total Facial Convexity Angle, Lower Face Angle, MAFH/LAFH Proportion, Lower Face Vertical Proportion, H.NB Angle, Ricketts E Line) were collected in two stages (pre-treatment and post-treatment). The Student T, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests analyzed the results. The significance level was 5%.

RESULTS

Among the cephalometric variables evaluated, only the measurements Interlabial Angle and H.NB Angle showed statistically significant changes during treatment. Increase was observed in the Interlabial Angle and decrease in H.NB Angle in both groups, resulting in a less convex facial profile with lip retraction.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that changes in the soft tissue facial profile are similar in Class I patients treated with or without tooth extraction.

摘要

目的

分析安氏I类错牙合患者正畸治疗后不拔牙与拔牙治疗的软组织面部轮廓变化。

方法

本研究纳入了20例接受正畸治疗的安氏I类错牙合患者的40张头颅侧位片。将患者分为两组:不拔牙组(A组)和拔除四颗第一前磨牙组(B组)。在两个阶段(治疗前和治疗后)收集与软组织面部轮廓相关的头影测量数据(鼻唇角、颏唇沟角、唇间角、面部凸度角、总面部凸度角、下面高角、MAFH/LAFH比例、下面高垂直比例、H.NB角、Ricketts E线)。采用学生t检验、Wilcoxon检验和Mann-Whitney检验分析结果。显著性水平为5%。

结果

在所评估的头影测量变量中,只有唇间角和H.NB角在治疗期间有统计学意义的变化。两组唇间角均增加,H.NB角均减小,导致面部轮廓凸度减小,唇部后缩。

结论

研究结果表明,不拔牙与拔牙治疗的安氏I类患者软组织面部轮廓变化相似。

相似文献

3
[ Ⅱ ].[Ⅱ].
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 9;56(1):63-69. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200330-00180.
4
Analyzing the effects of tooth extraction on the lip in orthodontic treatment.分析正畸治疗中拔牙对唇的影响。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;123(4):e126-e132. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
10
Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙后移导致的软组织侧貌变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 May;91(5):385-94. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90391-x.

引用本文的文献

5
Alterations in Integumental Facial Dimensions after Orthodontic Treatment.正畸治疗后面部皮肤维度的改变。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1474-S1477. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_257_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

6
Evolution of esthetic considerations in orthodontics.正畸学中美美观念的演变。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.010.
7
Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.拔牙矫治与不拔牙矫治:长期面部轮廓变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 May;147(5):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验