Suppr超能文献

将录制的互动研讨会和后续讨论作为远程学习的有效方法。

Recorded interactive seminars and follow-up discussions as an effective method for distance learning.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.013.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have suggested that, although orthodontic residents prefer to be live and interactive in a seminar, they learn almost as much when watching a previously recorded interactive seminar and following up with live discussion. Our objective was to test the effectiveness and acceptability of using previously recorded interactive seminars and different types of live follow-up discussions.

METHODS

Residents at schools participating from a distance completed preseminar readings and at their convenience watched streaming video of some or all recordings of 4 interactive seminar sequences consisting of 6 seminars each. Afterward, distant residents participated in 1 of 4 types of interaction: local follow-up discussion, videoconference, teleconference, and no discussion. The effectiveness of the seminar sequences was tested by pretest and posttest scores. Acceptability was evaluated from ratings of aspects of the seminar and discussion experience. Open-ended questions allowed residents to express what they liked and to suggest changes in their experiences.

RESULTS

In each seminar sequence, test scores of schools participating through recordings and follow-up discussions improved more than those participating live and interactive. After viewing, residents preferred local follow-up discussion, which was not statistically different from participating live and interactive both locally and from a distance. Videoconference and teleconference discussions were both more acceptable to residents than no follow-up discussion, which was found to be significantly below all methods tested.

CONCLUSIONS

When residents are live and interactive in a seminar, there does not appear to be a significant difference between being local vs at a distance. Recorded interactive seminars with follow-up discussions are also an effective and acceptable method of distance learning. Residents preferred local follow-up discussion, but, at a distance, they preferred videoconference to both teleconference and no discussion.

摘要

介绍

先前的研究表明,尽管正畸住院医师更喜欢在研讨会上进行现场互动,但他们在观看之前录制的互动研讨会并进行现场讨论后,也能学到几乎同样多的知识。我们的目的是测试使用先前录制的互动研讨会和不同类型的现场后续讨论的效果和可接受性。

方法

来自远程参与学校的住院医师在方便时完成课前阅读,并观看由 4 个互动研讨会序列组成的流媒体视频,每个序列由 6 个研讨会组成,其中一些或全部都可观看录制内容。之后,远程住院医师参与以下 4 种互动方式中的 1 种:本地后续讨论、视频会议、电话会议和无讨论。通过预测试和后测试分数来测试研讨会序列的效果。可接受性通过对研讨会和讨论体验的各个方面的评分进行评估。开放性问题允许住院医师表达他们的喜好,并对他们的体验提出改变建议。

结果

在每个研讨会序列中,通过录制和后续讨论参与的学校的测试分数都比现场互动参与的学校有所提高。在观看后,住院医师更喜欢本地后续讨论,这与现场互动无论是在本地还是远程参与都没有统计学上的差异。视频会议和电话会议讨论都比没有后续讨论更受住院医师的欢迎,而没有后续讨论的效果明显低于所有测试方法。

结论

当住院医师在研讨会上进行现场互动时,本地和远程参与之间似乎没有显著差异。带后续讨论的录制互动研讨会也是远程学习的一种有效和可接受的方法。住院医师更喜欢本地后续讨论,但远程参与时,他们更喜欢视频会议而不是电话会议和无讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验