• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人词汇学习中的性别差异。

Gender differences in adult word learning.

作者信息

Kaushanskaya Margarita, Marian Viorica, Yoo Jeewon

机构信息

Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, United States.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.02.002
PMID:21392726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3080468/
Abstract

In prior work, women were found to outperform men on short-term verbal memory tasks. The goal of the present work was to examine whether gender differences on short-term memory tasks are tied to the involvement of long-term memory in the learning process. In Experiment 1, men and women were compared on their ability to remember phonologically-familiar novel words and phonologically-unfamiliar novel words. Learning of phonologically-familiar novel words (but not of phonologically-unfamiliar novel words) can be supported by long-term phonological knowledge. Results revealed that women outperformed men on phonologically-familiar novel words, but not on phonologically-unfamiliar novel words. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 using a within-subjects design, and confirmed gender differences on phonologically-familiar, but not on phonologically-unfamiliar stimuli. These findings are interpreted to suggest that women are more likely than men to recruit native-language phonological knowledge during novel word-learning.

摘要

在先前的研究中,发现女性在短期言语记忆任务上的表现优于男性。本研究的目的是检验短期记忆任务中的性别差异是否与长期记忆在学习过程中的参与有关。在实验1中,比较了男性和女性记忆语音熟悉的新单词和语音不熟悉的新单词的能力。语音熟悉的新单词(而非语音不熟悉的新单词)的学习可以得到长期语音知识的支持。结果显示,女性在语音熟悉的新单词上表现优于男性,但在语音不熟悉的新单词上并非如此。在实验2中,我们采用被试内设计重复了实验1,并证实了在语音熟悉的刺激上存在性别差异,但在语音不熟悉的刺激上不存在。这些发现被解释为表明女性在学习新单词时比男性更有可能调用母语语音知识。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in adult word learning.成人词汇学习中的性别差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Word learning in adults with second-language experience: effects of phonological and referent familiarity.成人在第二语言经验下的词汇学习:语音和指称熟悉度的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):667-78. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0084). Epub 2012 Sep 19.
3
Gender Differences in Child Word Learning.儿童词汇学习中的性别差异。
Learn Individ Differ. 2013 Oct;27:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.002.
4
Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations.当新习得的单词具有相关语义表征时,它们在言语短期记忆中在语音方面更稳固。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Apr;98:85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Phonological sensitivity and the acquisition of new words in children.儿童的语音敏感性与新词习得
J Exp Child Psychol. 2000 Aug;76(4):275-301. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2549.
6
The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.新语学习中的双语优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):705-10. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.705.
7
Offline consolidation supersedes prior knowledge benefits in children's (but not adults') word learning.离线巩固优于儿童(而非成人)词汇学习中的先前知识收益。
Dev Sci. 2019 May;22(3):e12776. doi: 10.1111/desc.12776. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
Semantic and phonological schema influence spoken word learning and overnight consolidation.语义和语音图式影响口语学习及夜间巩固。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1469-1481. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1329325. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
9
Memory integration in amnesia: prior knowledge supports verbal short-term memory.失忆症中的记忆整合:先验知识支持言语短期记忆。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
10
Love is... an abstract word: the influence of lexical semantics on verbal short-term memory in Williams syndrome.
Cortex. 2005 Apr;41(2):169-79. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70891-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Within-Session Digital Motor Skill Acquisition and Alzheimer Disease Risk Factors Among the MindCrowd Cohort: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.MindCrowd队列中会话内数字运动技能习得与阿尔茨海默病风险因素之间的关系:横断面描述性研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Apr 24;8:e67298. doi: 10.2196/67298.
2
Sex differences in autonomic functions and cognitive performance during cold-air exposure and cold-water partial immersion.冷空气暴露和冷水局部浸泡期间自主神经功能和认知表现的性别差异。
Front Physiol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1463784. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1463784. eCollection 2024.
3
The relationship of speech perception and speech production: It's complicated.言语感知与言语产生的关系:很复杂。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):226-242. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02561-w. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Knowledge About Alzheimer's Disease in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯关于阿尔茨海默病的知识
Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50188. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
A new dynamic word learning task to diagnose language disorder in French-speaking monolingual and bilingual children.一项用于诊断法语单语和双语儿童语言障碍的新型动态单词学习任务。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jan 30;3:1095023. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1095023. eCollection 2022.
6
Talking to talkers: Infants' talk status, but not their gender, is related to language input.与健谈者交谈:婴儿的交谈状态,而不是其性别,与语言输入有关。
Child Dev. 2023 Mar;94(2):478-496. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13872. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.患有发育性语言障碍的成年人的词汇学习概况。
Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2020 Jan 1;5:1-19. doi: 10.1177/2396941519899311. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Can sex influence the neurocognition of language? Evidence from Parkinson's disease.性别会影响语言的神经认知吗?来自帕金森病的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Nov;148:107633. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107633. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Family history of Alzheimer's disease alters cognition and is modified by medical and genetic factors.阿尔茨海默病家族史会改变认知能力,并受医疗和遗传因素的影响。
Elife. 2019 Jun 18;8:e46179. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46179.
10
Validity and responsiveness to change of the Active Australia Survey according to gender, age, BMI, education, and physical activity level and awareness.根据性别、年龄、BMI、教育程度、身体活动水平和意识,对澳大利亚积极生活调查进行有效性和变化反应的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 15;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6717-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Decay theory of immediate memory: From Brown (1958) to today (2014).即时记忆的衰退理论:从布朗(1958年)到如今(2014年)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10):1969-95. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.914546. Epub 2014 May 22.
2
Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers.非词回忆中的语音规则概率效应及其与单语和双语学龄前儿童词汇量的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Apr;105(4):306-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
3
The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.新语学习中的双语优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):705-10. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.705.
4
Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition?形象性能够帮助我们区分存储和合成吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):849-66. doi: 10.1037/a0015286.
5
Bilingualism reduces native-language interference during novel-word learning.双语能力可减少新语词学习过程中的母语干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):829-35. doi: 10.1037/a0015275.
6
Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information.言语工作记忆与语言生成:言语信息序列排序的常见方法。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):50-68. doi: 10.1037/a0014411.
7
Mapping phonological information from auditory to written modality during foreign vocabulary learning.在外语词汇学习过程中,将语音信息从听觉模式映射到书写模式。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1145:56-70. doi: 10.1196/annals.1416.008.
8
Hemispheric specialization for language according to grapho-phonemic transformation and gender. A divided visual field experiment.基于字素-音素转换和性别的语言半球特化:一项视野分割实验。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
9
Gender differences in human cortical synaptic density.人类大脑皮质突触密度的性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14615-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803652105. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
10
Gender differences on WAIS-III incidental learning, pairing, and free recall.
Appl Neuropsychol. 2008;15(2):117-22. doi: 10.1080/09084280802083947.