Suppr超能文献

下肢截肢者步态中的生物力学和生理参数:系统评价。

Biomechanics and physiological parameters during gait in lower-limb amputees: a systematic review.

机构信息

UVHC, LAMIH, F-59313 Valenciennes, France.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2011 Apr;33(4):511-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify which biomechanical and physiological parameters are the most relevant, commonly used, able to discriminate and/or have specific clinical relevance for the gait analysis of lower-limb amputees (LLA).

METHODS

We performed an electronic search via the PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases from 1979 to May 2009. Two independent reviewers assessed the title and abstract of each identified study. The quality assessment of the full text was undertaken using a 13-item checklist divided into three levels: A, B, and C.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 584 abstracts to be considered. After applying the inclusion criteria, we reviewed the full text of a total of 89 articles. The mean article quality was 8±2. No A-level article was found; the primary reason was a negative score in blinded outcome assessment. Sixty-six articles (74%) corresponded to a B-level, and two articles (2%) corresponded to a C-level. Twenty-one articles (24%) did not acquire enough points to be assigned to any level. In this study, we present and discuss the most commonly used and most relevant 32 parameters. Many of the parameters found were not reported in enough studies or in enough detail to allow a useful evaluation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review can help researchers compare, choose and develop the most appropriate gait evaluation protocol for their field of study, based on the articles with best scores on the criteria list and the relevance of specific biomechanical and physiological parameters.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定哪些生物力学和生理学参数是最相关、最常用、能够区分和/或具有下肢截肢者步态分析的特定临床相关性。

方法

我们从 1979 年到 2009 年 5 月通过 PubMed、EMBASE 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 数据库进行了电子检索。两名独立的审查员评估了每个确定的研究的标题和摘要。使用分为 A、B 和 C 三个级别的 13 项检查表对全文质量进行评估。

结果

文献检索确定了 584 篇摘要进行考虑。在应用纳入标准后,我们总共审查了 89 篇文章的全文。平均文章质量为 8±2。未发现 A 级文章;主要原因是盲法结果评估的评分较低。66 篇文章(74%)对应 B 级,2 篇文章(2%)对应 C 级。21 篇文章(24%)未获得足够的分数归入任何级别。在这项研究中,我们提出并讨论了最常用和最相关的 32 个参数。许多发现的参数在足够的研究中或在足够的细节中没有被报告,无法进行有用的评估。

结论

本系统评价可以帮助研究人员根据具有最佳评分标准和特定生物力学和生理学参数相关性的文章,比较、选择和制定最适合其研究领域的步态评估方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验