• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年司法样本中 Miranda 权利理解工具的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments with a juvenile justice sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Drexel University, MS 626, 245 N. 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2011 Dec;18(4):428-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191111400280. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/1073191111400280
PMID:21393317
Abstract

This article describes the psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments, the revised version of Grisso's Miranda instruments. The original instruments demonstrated good reliability and validity in a normative sample. The revised instruments updated the content of the original instruments and were administered to a sample of 183 youth in pre- and postadjudication facilities. Analyses were conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the revised instruments and included similar analyses to those conducted by Grisso, as well as additional calculations (e.g., standard errors of measurement, intraclass correlation coefficients, Kappa coefficients). Results revealed sound psychometric properties, similar to those observed for the original instruments.

摘要

本文描述了 Miranda 权利理解工具(Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments)的心理计量学特性,即 Grisso 的 Miranda 工具的修订版。原始工具在规范样本中表现出良好的可靠性和有效性。修订后的工具更新了原始工具的内容,并在审前和审后设施中对 183 名青年进行了测试。进行了分析以确定修订工具的心理计量学特性,包括与 Grisso 进行的类似分析,以及其他计算(例如,测量的标准误差、组内相关系数、Kappa 系数)。结果显示出良好的心理计量学特性,与原始工具观察到的特性相似。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments with a juvenile justice sample.青少年司法样本中 Miranda 权利理解工具的心理测量学特性。
Assessment. 2011 Dec;18(4):428-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191111400280. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Juvenile offenders' Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions.青少年罪犯对米兰达权利的理解以及自我报告的做出虚假供述的可能性。
Assessment. 2003 Dec;10(4):359-69. doi: 10.1177/1073191103259535.
3
Evaluations of capacity to waive Miranda rights: a survey of practitioners' use of the Grisso instruments.放弃米兰达权利能力的评估:对从业者使用格里索工具的调查。
Assessment. 2007 Sep;14(3):300-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191110730284.
4
Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights.精神病患者对米兰达权利的理解。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):390-405. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9099-3. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
5
The Grisso tests for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda warnings with a forensic sample.格里索测试用于评估法医样本中对米兰达警告的理解和认识。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):673-92. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2018. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents.考察青少年在理解米兰达权利时的询问暗示性的作用。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Jun;35(3):165-77. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4.
7
Miranda rights comprehension instruments: a critical review.米兰达权利理解工具:批判性评价。
Assessment. 2013 Oct;20(5):545-54. doi: 10.1177/1073191113481054. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Juveniles' Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors.青少年对米兰达规则的理解:理解、认识及整体情况因素
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Jun;39(3):281-93. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000116. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
9
Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards.青少年被告的审判能力及对米兰达权利的理解:法律标准比较
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(1):1-19. doi: 10.1002/bsl.714.
10
Validity and Representative Data of the MRCI With Legally Involved Juveniles.针对涉及法律事务的青少年的MRCI的有效性和代表性数据。
Assessment. 2017 Jul;24(5):591-602. doi: 10.1177/1073191115621792. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
How does mobility and urban environment affect the migrants' settlement intention? A perspective from the intergenerational differences.流动和城市环境如何影响流动人口的定居意愿?从代际差异的角度来看。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;12:1343300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343300. eCollection 2024.