Central Pancreas Consortium †Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792-7375, USA.
Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):975-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128869.
Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (LLP) is associated with favorable outcomes compared with open left pancreatectomy (OLP). However, it is unclear if the risk factors associated with operative morbidity differ between these two techniques. Guidelines for determining which patients should undergo OLP versus LLP do not exist.
A multi-institutional analysis of OLP and LLP performed in 9 academic medical centers was undertaken. LLP cases were defined in an intent-to-treat manner. Perioperative variables were analyzed to identify factors associated with complications and pancreatic fistulae after OLP and LLP. In addition, complication and fistula rates for patients undergoing OLP and LLP were compared in matched cohorts to determine if one approach resulted in superior outcomes over the other.
Six hundred and ninety-three left pancreatectomy cases (439 OLP, 254 LLP) were analyzed. OLP and LLP cases were similar with respect to patient age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Body mass index (BMI) was higher in patients undergoing LLP. OLP was more often performed for adenocarcinoma and larger tumors, resulted in longer resected specimen lengths, and more commonly involved concomitant splenectomy. Estimated blood loss was higher and operative times were longer during OLP. On multivariate analysis, variables associated with major complications and clinically significant fistulae differed between OLP and LLP. Patients with body mass index ≤27, without adenocarcinoma, and with pancreatic specimen length ≤8.5 cm had significantly higher rates of significant fistulae after OLP than after LLP; in contrast, no preoperatively evaluable variables were associated with a higher likelihood of significant fistula after LLP versus OLP.
Risk factors for complications and pancreatic fistulae after left pancreatectomy differ when open versus laparoscopic techniques are employed. Preoperative characteristics may identify cohorts of patients who will benefit more from LLP, and no patient cohorts had higher postoperative complication rates after LLP than OLP. These observations suggest that LLP may be the operative procedure of choice for most patients with left-sided pancreatic lesions; a more definitive prospective and randomized comparison may be warranted.
与开腹左胰切除术(OLP)相比,腹腔镜左胰切除术(LLP)具有更好的疗效。然而,目前尚不清楚这两种技术的手术并发症风险因素是否存在差异。目前还没有确定哪些患者应该接受 OLP 或 LLP 的指南。
对 9 家学术医疗中心进行的 OLP 和 LLP 多机构分析。以意向治疗的方式定义 LLP 病例。分析围手术期变量,以确定 OLP 和 LLP 术后并发症和胰瘘的相关因素。此外,还比较了接受 OLP 和 LLP 的患者的并发症和瘘管发生率,以确定一种方法是否优于另一种方法。
共分析了 693 例左胰切除术病例(439 例 OLP,254 例 LLP)。OLP 和 LLP 病例在患者年龄和美国麻醉医师协会评分方面相似。接受 LLP 的患者 BMI 更高。OLP 更常用于腺癌和较大肿瘤,导致更长的切除标本长度,更常见的同时行脾切除术。OLP 的估计出血量更高,手术时间更长。多变量分析显示,OLP 和 LLP 术后主要并发症和有临床意义的瘘管之间的相关因素不同。BMI≤27、无腺癌和胰腺标本长度≤8.5cm 的患者,OLP 后发生显著瘘管的风险显著高于 LLP;相反,没有术前可评估的变量与 LLP 后发生显著瘘管的可能性高于 OLP 相关。
当使用开腹与腹腔镜技术时,左胰切除术术后并发症和胰瘘的危险因素不同。术前特征可能会确定更受益于 LLP 的患者队列,而且没有患者队列在 LLP 后比 OLP 后有更高的术后并发症发生率。这些观察结果表明,对于大多数左侧胰腺病变患者,LLP 可能是手术的首选方法;可能需要更明确的前瞻性和随机比较。