• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evolution of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at a single institution.单一机构微创远端胰腺切除术的发展历程
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_26_17.
2
Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.微创与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌的疗效比较。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jun;148(6):525-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1673.
3
Propensity-Score Matched Analyses Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomies: A Single-Center Experience.倾向评分匹配分析比较微创与开放远端胰腺切除术的临床结果:单中心经验
World J Surg. 2022 Jan;46(1):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06306-x. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
4
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Use of Reinforced Staplers Decreases the Rate of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Compared to Bare Staplers After Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomies.与裸吻合器相比,微创胰体尾切除术使用加固吻合器可降低术后胰瘘的发生率。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Oct;31(10):1124-1129. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0754. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgeries: A single institution experience with 150 consecutive procedures in Southeast Asia.与采用微创胰腺手术相关的趋势和结果变化:东南亚一家机构连续150例手术的经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):404-410. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_127_19.
7
Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis.微创胰体尾切除术改善围手术期结局:基于人群的分析结果。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):237-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3202.
8
Trends and disparities in access to minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (midp): an eight-year analysis from the national cancer database.微创远端胰腺切除术(midp)的可及性趋势和差异:国家癌症数据库八年分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01775-9.
9
Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS).全国性微创远端胰腺切除术(LAELAPS)培训计划的影响。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):754-762. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001888.
10
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.微创与开腹远端胰腺切除术(LEOPARD):一项多中心患者盲法随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open spleen-saving distal pancreatectomies.微创与开放保脾远端胰腺切除术后的短期和长期结局
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):118-124. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_178_20.
2
A single institution experience with robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.单机构开展机器人辅助和腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的经验
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020 Aug 31;24(3):283-291. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.3.283.
3
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatectomies for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study.微创与开腹胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤切除术的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3043-3051. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05582-3.
4
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally-invasive pancreato-biliary surgery: Contemporary experience of a 'self-taught' early adopter in Southeast Asia.与采用微创胰胆手术相关的趋势和结果变化:东南亚一位“自学成才”的早期采用者的当代经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):341-347. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_94_19.
5
Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for isolated blunt traumatic pancreatic laceration: A case report and review of current literature.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Nov;23(4):408-413. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.4.408. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgeries: A single institution experience with 150 consecutive procedures in Southeast Asia.与采用微创胰腺手术相关的趋势和结果变化:东南亚一家机构连续150例手术的经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):404-410. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_127_19.
7
First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.新加坡首例机器人胰十二指肠切除术的经验。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Nov;61(11):598-604. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019119. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
8
Critical Appraisal of the Impact of the Systematic Adoption of Advanced Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery on the Surgical Management of Mirizzi Syndrome.系统采用先进的微创肝胆胰外科对 Mirizzi 综合征手术治疗影响的评价。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3138-3152. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05164-y.
9
Minimally-invasive versus open enucleation for pancreatic tumours: A propensity-score adjusted analysis.胰腺肿瘤的微创与开放剜除术:倾向评分调整分析
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Aug;23(3):258-264. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.258. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Outcome of minimally-invasive versus open pancreatectomies for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: A 2:1 matched case-control study.胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤的微创与开放胰腺切除术的结局:一项2:1匹配病例对照研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Aug;23(3):252-257. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.252. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Review of the English Literature.微创远端胰腺切除术:英文文献综述
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):134-140. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0132. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术——来自德国StuDoQ|胰腺登记处的倾向评分匹配分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Feb;32(2):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2693-4. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
3
Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.老年患者接受腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后的围手术期结局与生存情况
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Jan;24(1):42-48. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.409.
4
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:众多荟萃分析,确定性却寥寥无几。
Updates Surg. 2016 Sep;68(3):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0389-5. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Factors associated with and consequences of open conversion after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: initial experience at a single institution.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术中转开腹的相关因素及后果:单中心初步经验
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Dec;87(12):E271-E275. doi: 10.1111/ans.13661. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients.腹腔镜下左半胰切除术:115例连续患者的早期结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4480-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4780-6. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
8
First experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy in Singapore: a report of three consecutive cases.新加坡首例机器人保留脾脏、保留血管的远端胰腺切除术:连续三例报告。
Singapore Med J. 2016 Aug;57(8):464-9. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016020. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
Predictive factors associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a 10-year single-institution experience.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后胰瘘的相关预测因素:一项为期10年的单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4255-1. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺良恶性病变的系统评价和荟萃分析:是时候进行随机对照试验了。
Surgery. 2015 Jan;157(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081.

单一机构微创远端胰腺切除术的发展历程

Evolution of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at a single institution.

作者信息

Goh Brian K P, Lee Ser-Yee, Kam Juinn-Huar, Soh Hui Ling, Cheow Peng-Chung, Chow Pierce K H, Ooi London L P J, Chung Alexander Y F, Chan Chung-Yip

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 169856, Singapore.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_26_17.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_26_17
PMID:28928328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5869974/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to study the changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) at a single centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of sixty consecutive patients who underwent MIDP from September 2006 to November 2016 at a single institution. To study the evolution of MIDP, the study population was divided into three groups consisting of twenty patients (Group I, Group II and Group III).

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent MIDP with 11 (18.3%) requiring open conversions. The median operation time was 305 (range: 85-775) min and the median post-operative stay was 6 (range: 3-73) days. Fifteen procedures were spleen-saving pancreatectomies. Major post-operative morbidity (>Grade 2) occurred in 12 (20.0%) patients and there was no mortality or reoperations. There were 33 (55.0%) pancreatic fistulas, of which 15 (25.0%) were Grade B fistulas of which 12 (20.0%) required percutaneous drainage. Comparison between the three groups demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the frequency of procedures performed, increase in robotic-assisted procedures and proportion of asymptomatic tumours resected. There also tended to be non-significant decrease in open conversion rates from 25% to 5% between the three groups and increase in tumour size resected from 24 to 40 mm.

CONCLUSION

Comparison between the three groups demonstrated that MIDP was performed with increased frequency. There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of resections performed for asymptomatic tumours and resections performed through robotic assistance. There was also a non-significant trend towards a decrease in open conversions and increase in the size of tumours resected.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在探讨在单一中心采用微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)的变化趋势及结果。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2006年9月至2016年11月在单一机构连续接受MIDP的60例患者。为研究MIDP的发展演变,将研究人群分为三组,每组20例患者(第一组、第二组和第三组)。

结果

60例患者接受了MIDP,其中11例(18.3%)需要转为开放手术。中位手术时间为305(范围:85 - 775)分钟,中位术后住院时间为6(范围:3 - 73)天。15例手术为保留脾脏的胰腺切除术。12例(20.0%)患者发生了严重术后并发症(>2级),无死亡或再次手术情况。发生了33例(55.0%)胰瘘,其中15例(25.0%)为B级胰瘘,12例(20.0%)需要经皮引流。三组之间的比较显示,手术操作频率有统计学意义的增加,机器人辅助手术增加,无症状肿瘤切除比例增加。三组之间开放手术转换率也有从25%降至5%的非显著性下降趋势,切除肿瘤大小从24毫米增加到40毫米。

结论

三组之间的比较表明,MIDP的实施频率有所增加。无症状肿瘤切除频率和机器人辅助切除频率有统计学意义的增加。开放手术转换率也有非显著性下降趋势,切除肿瘤大小增加。