Suppr超能文献

NHS 与制药业之间风险分担协议的简单经济学原理。

The simple economics of risk-sharing agreements between the NHS and the pharmaceutical industry.

机构信息

Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):461-70. doi: 10.1002/hec.1603.

Abstract

The introduction of new (and expensive) pharmaceutical products is one of the major challenges for health systems. The search for new institutional arrangements is natural. The use of the so-called risk-sharing agreements is one example. Recent discussions have somewhat neglected the economic fundamentals underlying risk-sharing agreements. We argue here that risk-sharing agreements, although attractive due to the principle of paying by results, also entail risks. Too many patients may be put under treatment. Prices are likely to be adjusted upward, in anticipation of future risk-sharing agreements between the pharmaceutical company and the third-party payer. An available instrument is a verification cost per patient treated, which allows obtaining the first-best allocation of patients to the new treatment, under the agreement. Overall, the welfare effects of risk-sharing agreements are ambiguous, and caution is urged regarding their use.

摘要

新型(昂贵)药品的引入是医疗体系面临的主要挑战之一。寻求新的制度安排是自然而然的。所谓风险分担协议的使用就是一个例子。最近的讨论在一定程度上忽略了风险分担协议背后的经济基础。我们在此认为,风险分担协议虽然由于按结果付费的原则具有吸引力,但也存在风险。可能会有太多的患者接受治疗。由于预计制药公司和第三方支付者之间会有未来的风险分担协议,价格可能会向上调整。一种可用的手段是每位治疗患者的核查成本,这允许根据协议将患者最佳分配到新的治疗中。总体而言,风险分担协议的福利效应是不确定的,因此在使用时需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验