Suppr超能文献

巴尔的摩市性传播感染诊所中快速 HIV 检测和进入护理的选择。

Choice of Rapid HIV testing and entrance into care in Baltimore City sexually transmitted infections clinics.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011 Apr;25(4):237-43. doi: 10.1089/apc.2010.0298. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

Abstract

Point-of-service (POS) HIV testing in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics is one public health strategy to increase knowledge of serostatus and to facilitate entry into care. Variation has been reported in clients' views of test reliability and rates of test acceptance. Our objective was to characterize STI clinic patients' choice of POS versus conventional testing (enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay [ELISA] followed by Western blot, with results in 1 week) in Baltimore, Maryland (a high-prevalence city) when both were offered (May through August 2008), then to compare rates of engaging in care. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) described factors associated with test type choice, as well as HIV test type with entrance into care. The overall prevalence of HIV among testers was 1.1% (60/5101). Those reporting receptive anal sex (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7), illicit drug use (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.6), or an HIV-positive sexual contact (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.2) were more likely to choose POS testing, as were those who had been tested for HIV previously (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5). Hispanics were less likely to choose POS testing (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4- 0.7). Entry into care was low in both categories of test takers (52% in POS testers versus 42% in conventional testers, p = 0.58). Patients at the highest risk for HIV preferred POS testing in STI clinics. Strengthening linkage to care is important for optimizing outcomes of HIV-positive patients presenting to STI clinics.

摘要

在性传播感染 (STI) 诊所进行即时检测 (POS) 是提高血清阳性率知识并促进进入护理的公共卫生策略之一。已经报道了客户对测试可靠性和测试接受率的看法存在差异。我们的目的是描述马里兰州巴尔的摩市 (一个高流行城市) 的 STI 诊所患者在同时提供 POS 和传统检测 (酶联免疫吸附试验 [ELISA] 后进行 Western blot,结果在 1 周内) 时选择 POS 检测而不是传统检测的情况,然后比较进入护理的比率。比值比 (OR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI) 描述了与测试类型选择相关的因素,以及与进入护理相关的 HIV 测试类型。测试者中 HIV 的总体流行率为 1.1% (60/5101)。报告接受肛交 (OR 1.4;95% CI 1.1-1.7)、非法药物使用 (OR 1.3;95% CI 1.0-1.6) 或 HIV 阳性性接触 (OR 1.5;95% CI 1.0-2.2) 的人更有可能选择 POS 检测,之前接受过 HIV 检测的人也是如此 (OR 1.3;95% CI 1.1-1.5)。西班牙裔人更不可能选择 POS 检测 (OR 0.6;95% CI 0.4-0.7)。两种测试类型的接受者进入护理的比例都很低 (POS 测试者中为 52%,传统测试者中为 42%,p=0.58)。处于 HIV 最高风险的患者在 STI 诊所更喜欢 POS 检测。加强与护理的联系对于优化向 STI 诊所就诊的 HIV 阳性患者的结果非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验