Suppr超能文献

带有冠状面重建的CT可识别钝性创伤后先前漏诊的较小膈肌损伤。

CT with coronal reconstruction identifies previously missed smaller diaphragmatic injuries after blunt trauma.

作者信息

Bhullar Indermeet S, Block Ernest F J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida School of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2011 Jan;77(1):55-8.

Abstract

Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are difficult to diagnose and often go unrecognized after blunt trauma. We proposed that CT scan with coronal reconstruction (CTCR) improves the detection of small DIs missed by chest x-ray (CXR) and CT scan with axial views (CTAX). We performed a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center from 2001 to 2006 and identified 35 patients who underwent operative repair of DI after blunt trauma. The size of the DI and the radiographic test (CXR, CTAX, and CTCR) that identified the defect was compared. Results were analyzed using mean, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher exact test. Of the 35 DI repairs, nine were performed after CXR alone and 12 after identification by both a CXR and CTAX. There was no significant difference between the mean DI size identified by CXR with and without CTAX (10.6 vs 9.7, P = 0.88). The remaining 14 DIs were undetected by CXR and CTAX. Seven of these (before CTCR) were found during exploratory laparotomy and seven were identified by CTCR (4.6 cm vs 3.5 cm, P = 0.33). The mean DI size identified by CTCR was significantly smaller than that identified by CXR alone (4.6 cm vs 9.7 cm, P < 0.05) and by CXR and CTAX (4.6 cm vs 10.6 cm, P < 0.0005). CTCR improves the ability to detect smaller DI defects (4 to 8 cm) that were previously missed by CXR and CTAX. CTAX adds little to CXR alone for the diagnosis of large defects (greater than 8 cm).

摘要

膈肌损伤(DIs)难以诊断,在钝性创伤后常未被发现。我们提出,采用冠状面重建的CT扫描(CTCR)能提高对胸部X线(CXR)和轴位CT扫描(CTAX)漏诊的小膈肌损伤的检测能力。我们对一家一级创伤中心2001年至2006年的病例进行了回顾性研究,确定了35例钝性创伤后接受膈肌损伤手术修复的患者。比较了膈肌损伤的大小以及发现缺损的影像学检查(CXR、CTAX和CTCR)。结果采用均值、曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验进行分析。在35例膈肌损伤修复病例中,仅通过CXR后进行修复的有9例,通过CXR和CTAX两者均发现后进行修复的有12例。CXR单独检查时以及联合CTAX检查时所确定的平均膈肌损伤大小之间无显著差异(分别为10.6和9.7,P = 0.88)。其余14例膈肌损伤未被CXR和CTAX检测到。其中7例(在CTCR之前)在剖腹探查术中发现,7例通过CTCR发现(分别为4.6 cm和3.5 cm,P = 0.33)。CTCR所确定的平均膈肌损伤大小显著小于仅通过CXR所确定的大小(4.6 cm对9.7 cm,P < 0.05)以及通过CXR和CTAX所确定的大小(4.6 cm对10.6 cm,P < 0.0005)。CTCR提高了检测先前被CXR和CTAX漏诊的较小膈肌损伤缺损(4至8 cm)的能力。对于诊断大于8 cm的大缺损,CTAX单独对CXR的补充作用不大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验