Trupka A, Kierse R, Waydhas C, Nast-Kolb D, Blahs U, Schweiberer L, Pfeifer K J
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Innenstadt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Unfallchirurg. 1997 Jun;100(6):469-76. doi: 10.1007/s001130050144.
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest X-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work-up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether the additional information obtained influences subsequent decisions on therapy in the early management of severely injured patients.
In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiological signs of chest trauma (94 multiply injured patients with chest trauma, 9 patients with isolated chest trauma) who had an average ISS of 30 and an average AIS thorax of 3, initial CXR and TCT were compared after the first assessment in our emergency department (a level I trauma center). Mortality in this group was 10% (n = 10).
In 67 patients (65%) TCT revealed major complications of chest trauma that had been missed on CXR: lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax ((n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1); in 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT; and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed identical pathologic results. In 11 patients neither CXR nor TCT revealed pathologic findings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (P < 0.001), pneumothorax (P < 0.005) and hemothorax (P < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings did affect, the therapy selected: chest tube placement or chest tube correction in mostly anteriorly located pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), influence on ventilation mode and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), pericardiocentesis (n = 1).
TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualizing lung contusions and pneumo- and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a considerable subset of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the primary diagnostic work-up of multiple injured patients with suspected chest trauma, because early and accurate diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with acceptance of the implications for therapy may reduce complications and improve the outcome in polytraumatized patients with blunt chest trauma.
本前瞻性研究旨在评估早期胸部计算机断层扫描(TCT)在钝性胸部创伤诊断检查中是否优于常规胸部X线(CXR),以及所获得的额外信息是否会影响对重伤患者早期治疗的后续决策。
在一项前瞻性研究中,对103例连续的有胸部创伤临床或放射学征象的患者(94例多发伤合并胸部创伤患者,9例单纯胸部创伤患者)进行研究,这些患者的损伤严重度评分(ISS)平均为30,胸部简明损伤定级(AIS)平均为3。在我们的急诊科(一级创伤中心)进行首次评估后,比较初始的CXR和TCT。该组患者的死亡率为10%(n = 10)。
在67例患者(65%)中,TCT显示出CXR漏诊的胸部创伤主要并发症:肺挫伤(n = 33)、气胸(n = 27)、胸腔闭式引流术后残留气胸(n = 7)、血胸(n = 21)、胸腔引流管移位(n = 5)、膈肌破裂(n = 2)、心肌破裂(n = 1);11例患者在TCT上仅显示轻微的额外病理表现(肺不张、少量胸腔积液);14例患者CXR和TCT显示相同的病理结果。11例患者CXR和TCT均未显示病理结果。TCT扫描在检测肺挫伤(P < 0.001)、气胸(P < 0.005)和血胸(P < 0.05)方面明显比常规CXR更有效。42例患者(41%)中,TCT的额外发现确实影响了所选的治疗:在大多数位于前方的气胸或大量血胸时进行胸腔闭式引流或调整胸腔引流管(n = 31),对通气模式和呼吸护理的影响(n = 14),对骨折固定处理的影响(n = 12),膈肌撕裂时进行剖腹手术(n = 2),因肺不张进行支气管镜检查(n = 2),排除主动脉破裂(n = 2),气管插管(n = 1),心包穿刺(n = 1)。
TCT在检测钝性胸部创伤后的胸部损伤方面高度敏感,在显示肺挫伤和气胸、血胸方面优于常规CXR。早期TCT在相当一部分患者中影响治疗管理。因此,我们建议对疑似胸部创伤的多发伤患者进行初步诊断检查时采用TCT,因为对所有胸部损伤进行早期准确诊断并接受其对治疗的影响,可能会减少并发症并改善钝性胸部创伤多发伤患者的预后。