Suppr超能文献

采用 16S rDNA PCR 快速诊断化脓性关节炎:3 种方法的比较。

Rapid diagnosis of septic arthritis using 16S rDNA PCR: a comparison of 3 methods.

机构信息

Summa Health System, Akron, OH 44304, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;69(4):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.11.010.

Abstract

Few studies address the utility of molecular techniques for diagnosis of infection in synovial fluid (SF). We evaluated 3 different methods using 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on 63 specimens for the diagnosis of joint infection. SF samples were classified as normal, inflammatory, or septic based on the patient's clinical and laboratory results. Samples were analyzed by conventional PCR using primers for the bacterial 16S rDNA gene and by real-time PCR utilizing 2 different sets of primers for the target gene 16S rDNA. PCR results were compared to culture results. All inflammatory and normal SF samples were culture negative. There was concordance with 10 of the 16 septic samples by 2 of the PCR methods. When comparing 3 methods for rapid detection of septic arthritis, real-time PCR using SYBR-Green I and conventional PCR demonstrated favorable test characteristics, but need further study.

摘要

很少有研究探讨分子技术在诊断滑液(SF)感染中的应用。我们评估了 3 种不同的方法,使用 16S rDNA 聚合酶链反应(PCR)对 63 个样本进行了检测,以诊断关节感染。根据患者的临床和实验室结果,SF 样本被分为正常、炎症或感染。样本通过常规 PCR 进行分析,使用针对细菌 16S rDNA 基因的引物,并通过实时 PCR 利用针对目标基因 16S rDNA 的 2 套不同引物进行分析。PCR 结果与培养结果进行比较。所有炎症和正常的 SF 样本均为培养阴性。2 种 PCR 方法与 16 个感染性样本中的 10 个具有一致性。当比较 3 种用于快速检测化脓性关节炎的方法时,实时 PCR 结合 SYBR-Green I 和常规 PCR 显示出良好的检测特征,但需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验