Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 May;57(5):724-32. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Currently more than 340,000 individuals are receiving long-term hemodialysis (HD) therapy for end-stage renal disease and therefore are particularly vulnerable to influenza, prone to more severe influenza outcomes, and less likely to achieve seroprotection from standard influenza vaccines. Influenza vaccine adjuvants, chemical or biologic compounds added to a vaccine to boost the elicited immunologic response, may help overcome this problem.
Economic stochastic decision analytic simulation model.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: US adult HD population.
MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME: The model simulated the decision to use either an adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted vaccine, assumed the societal perspective, and represented a single influenza season, or 1 year.
Adjuvanted influenza vaccine at different adjuvant costs and efficacies. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of varying influenza clinical attack rate, influenza hospitalization rate, and influenza-related mortality.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvanted influenza vaccine (vs nonadjuvanted) with effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years.
Adjuvanted influenza vaccine would be cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year) at a $1 adjuvant cost (on top of the standard vaccine cost) when adjuvant efficacy (in overcoming the difference between influenza vaccine response in HD patients and healthy adults) ≥60% and economically dominant (provides both cost savings and health benefits) when the $1 adjuvant's efficacy is 100%. A $2 adjuvant would be cost-effective if adjuvant efficacy was 100%.
All models are simplifications of real life and cannot capture all possible factors and outcomes.
Adjuvanted influenza vaccine with adjuvant cost ≤$2 could be a cost-effective strategy in a standard influenza season depending on the potency of the adjuvant.
目前,超过 34 万人正在接受终末期肾病的长期血液透析(HD)治疗,因此他们特别容易感染流感,更容易出现更严重的流感后果,并且不太可能从标准流感疫苗中获得血清保护。流感疫苗佐剂是添加到疫苗中以增强所引起的免疫反应的化学或生物化合物,可能有助于克服这一问题。
经济随机决策分析模拟模型。
美国成年 HD 人群。
模型、视角和时间范围:该模型模拟了使用佐剂或非佐剂疫苗的决策,采用了社会视角,并代表了一个流感季节或 1 年。
不同佐剂成本和功效的佐剂流感疫苗。敏感性分析探讨了流感临床发病率、流感住院率和流感相关死亡率变化的影响。
用质量调整生命年来衡量,佐剂流感疫苗(与非佐剂相比)的增量成本效益比。
当佐剂功效(克服 HD 患者和健康成年人之间流感疫苗反应的差异)≥60%,且 1 美元佐剂的功效为 100%时,佐剂流感疫苗的成本效益(增量成本效益比<50000 美元/质量调整生命年)将在 1 美元的佐剂成本(在标准疫苗成本之上)下具有成本效益;如果佐剂的功效为 100%,则 2 美元的佐剂将具有成本效益。
所有模型都是对现实生活的简化,无法捕捉所有可能的因素和结果。
在标准流感季节,根据佐剂的效力,佐剂成本≤2 美元的佐剂流感疫苗可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。