• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗钙化性和非钙化性肩袖肌腱病有效性的证据——一项系统评价。

Evidence for effectiveness of Extracorporal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) to treat calcific and non-calcific rotator cuff tendinosis--a systematic review.

作者信息

Huisstede Bionka M A, Gebremariam Lukas, van der Sande Renske, Hay Elaine M, Koes Bart W

机构信息

Erasmus MC, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):419-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.math.2011.02.005
PMID:21396877
Abstract

Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is suggested as a treatment alternative for calcific and non-calcific rotator cuff tendinosis (RC-tendinosis), which may decrease the need for surgery. In this study we assessed the evidence for effectiveness of ESWT for these disorders. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Pedro, and Cinahl were searched for relevant systematic reviews and RCTs. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. Seventeen RCTs (11 calcific, 6 non-calcific) were included. For calcific RC-tendinosis, strong evidence was found for effectiveness in favour of high-ESWT versus low-ESWT in short-term. Moderate evidence was found in favour of high-ESWT versus placebo in short-, mid- and long-term and versus low-ESWT in mid- and long-term. Moreover, high-ESWT was more effective (moderate evidence) with focus on calcific deposit versus focus on tuberculum major in short- and long-term. RSWT was more effective (moderate evidence) than placebo in mid-term. For non-calcific RC-tendinosis, no strong or moderate evidence was found in favour of low-, mid- or high-ESWT versus placebo, each other, or other treatments. This review shows that only high-ESWT is effective for treating calcific RC-tendinosis. No evidence was found for the effectiveness of ESWT to treat non-calcific RC-tendinosis.

摘要

体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)被建议作为钙化性和非钙化性肩袖肌腱病(RC肌腱病)的一种治疗选择,这可能会减少手术需求。在本研究中,我们评估了ESWT治疗这些疾病有效性的证据。检索了Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、Pedro和Cinahl以查找相关的系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)。两名评价员独立提取数据并评估方法学质量。纳入了17项RCT(11项钙化性,6项非钙化性)。对于钙化性RC肌腱病,发现有力证据表明在短期,高能量ESWT对比低能量ESWT更有效。发现中等证据支持在短期、中期和长期,高能量ESWT对比安慰剂更有效,以及在中期和长期对比低能量ESWT更有效。此外,在短期和长期,聚焦于钙化沉积物的高能量ESWT比聚焦于大结节的更有效(中等证据)。中期时,RSWT比安慰剂更有效(中等证据)。对于非钙化性RC肌腱病,未发现有力或中等证据支持低、中或高能量ESWT对比安慰剂、彼此之间或其他治疗更有效。本综述表明,只有高能量ESWT对治疗钙化性RC肌腱病有效。未发现ESWT治疗非钙化性RC肌腱病有效的证据。

相似文献

1
Evidence for effectiveness of Extracorporal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) to treat calcific and non-calcific rotator cuff tendinosis--a systematic review.体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗钙化性和非钙化性肩袖肌腱病有效性的证据——一项系统评价。
Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):419-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcific and noncalcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff: a systematic review.体外冲击波疗法治疗肩袖钙化性和非钙化性肌腱炎:一项系统评价
J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):132-51. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.003.
3
The midterm effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of chronic calcific shoulder tendinitis.体外冲击波治疗慢性钙化性肩袖肌腱炎的中期疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jul;20(5):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
4
The Effectiveness of High-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound-Guided Needling Versus Arthroscopic Surgery in the Management of Chronic Calcific Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review.高能体外冲击波疗法与超声引导下针刺疗法及关节镜手术治疗慢性钙化性肩袖肌腱病的疗效比较:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):165-75. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.049. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease.用于肩袖疾病的电疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012225.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Non-surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease.非手术治疗 Peyronie 病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 17;7(7):CD012206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012206.pub2.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage, corticosteroid injection and combined treatment for the treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: a network meta-analysis of RCTs.体外冲击波疗法、超声引导下经皮灌洗、皮质类固醇注射及联合治疗用于治疗肩袖钙化性肌腱炎:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):381-390. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1839-y. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease.肩袖疾病的手法治疗与运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012224.

引用本文的文献

1
Tendon overuse models have different effects on tissue mechanical properties in ex vivo bovine tendons.肌腱过度使用模型对离体牛肌腱的组织力学性能有不同影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2025 Aug 7;84:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103043.
2
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Evaluating Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Tendinopathies: A Scoping Review.评估体外冲击波疗法对肌腱病疗效的系统评价和Meta分析的报告及方法学质量:一项范围综述
J Chiropr Med. 2024 Sep;23(3):136-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
体外冲击波疗法治疗上肢肌腱炎的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 30;11:1394268. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394268. eCollection 2024.
4
One-shot platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is non-inferior to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of supraspinatus tendinosis.单次注射富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗肩袖冈上肌腱病不劣于体外冲击波治疗。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Dec;107(4):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00778-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial.经皮钙化灶抽吸术与冲击波治疗对保守治疗抵抗性肩钙化性肌腱炎的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 31;23(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05259-z.
6
Do we need to improve the reporting of evidence in tendinopathy management? A critical appraisal of systematic reviews with recommendations on strength of evidence assessment.我们是否需要改进肌腱病管理中证据的报告?对系统评价的批判性评估及关于证据强度评估的建议。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Feb 23;7(1):e000920. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000920. eCollection 2021.
7
Effectiveness of Focused Shockwave Therapy versus Radial Shockwave Therapy for Noncalcific Rotator Cuff Tendinopathies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.聚焦式冲击波疗法与放射状冲击波疗法治疗非钙化性肩袖肌腱病的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 9;2021:6687094. doi: 10.1155/2021/6687094. eCollection 2021.
8
Effect of platelet-rich plasma on the degenerative rotator cuff tendinopathy according to the compositions.富血小板血浆对不同成分变性肩袖肌腱病的疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 2;14(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1406-4.
9
Comparison of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Traditional Physiotherapy in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis Treatment.桡骨体外冲击波疗法与传统物理疗法治疗肩袖钙化性肌腱炎的比较
Arch Rheumatol. 2019 Jan 28;34(3):281-287. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2019.7081. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Calcified and Noncalcified Shoulder Tendinosis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗钙化性和非钙化性肩袖肌腱病的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 14;2019:2958251. doi: 10.1155/2019/2958251. eCollection 2019.