Ray C A, Delp M D, Hartle D K
Department of Physical Education, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Am J Physiol. 1990 May;258(5 Pt 1):E775-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.5.E775.
The purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that supine exercise elicits a greater atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) response than upright exercise because of higher atrial filling pressure attained in the supine posture. Plasma ANP concentration ([ANP]) was measured during continuous graded supine and upright exercise in eight healthy men at rest after 4 min of cycling exercise at 31, 51, and 79% of posture-specific peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), after 2 min of cycling at posture-specific VO2 peak, and 5 and 15 min postexercise. [ANP] was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) above rest by 64, 140, and 228% during supine cycling at 51 and 79% and VO2 peak, respectively. During upright cycling, [ANP] was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) at 79% (60%) and VO2 peak (125%). After 15 min of postexercise rest, [ANP] remained elevated (P less than 0.05) only in the supine subjects. [ANP] was 63, 79, and 75% higher (P less than 0.05) in the supine than in the upright position during cycling at 51 and 79% and VO2 peak. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were not significantly (P greater than 0.05) different between positions in all measurement periods. Heart rates were lower (P less than 0.05) in the supine position compared with the upright position. In conclusion, these results suggest that supine exercise elicits greater ANP release independent of blood pressure and heart rate but presumably caused by greater venous return, central blood volume, and concomitant atrial filling pressure and stretch.
由于仰卧姿势下心房充盈压较高,仰卧运动比直立运动能引起更大的心房利钠肽(ANP)反应。在8名健康男性中,于休息状态下、在以特定姿势下峰值摄氧量(VO₂峰值)的31%、51%和79%进行4分钟骑行运动后、以特定姿势下VO₂峰值进行2分钟骑行运动后以及运动后5分钟和15分钟时,测量其在连续分级仰卧和直立运动过程中的血浆ANP浓度([ANP])。在仰卧骑行至51%和79%VO₂峰值以及VO₂峰值时,[ANP]分别比静息时显著升高(P<0.05)64%、140%和228%。在直立骑行时,[ANP]在79%(60%)VO₂峰值和VO₂峰值(125%)时显著升高(P<0.05)。运动后休息15分钟后,仅仰卧位受试者的[ANP]仍处于升高状态(P<0.05)。在骑行至51%和79%VO₂峰值以及VO₂峰值时,仰卧位的[ANP]比直立位高63%、79%和75%(P<0.05)。在所有测量时段,仰卧位和直立位之间的收缩压﹑舒张压和平均血压均无显著差异(P>0.05)。仰卧位的心率低于直立位(P<0.05)。总之,这些结果表明,仰卧运动能引起更大的ANP释放,这与血压和心率无关,但可能是由于更大的静脉回流、中心血容量以及随之而来的心房充盈压和牵张所致。