Suppr超能文献

恒定负荷运动的摄氧动力学:直立运动与仰卧运动对比

Oxygen uptake kinetics of constant-load work: upright vs. supine exercise.

作者信息

Convertino V A, Goldwater D J, Sandler H

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 Jun;55(6):501-6.

PMID:6466245
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare oxygen uptake (VO2), O2 deficit, steady-state VO2, and recovery VO2 during the performance of a constant-load exercise in the supine and upright position. Ten male subjects (36-40 yr) performed one submaximal exercise test in the supine and one in the upright position consisting of 5 min rest, 5 min cycle ergometer exercise at 700 kg X min-1 and 10 min of recovery from exercise. The VO2 was measured continuously in all tests from 2-L aliquot air samples collected every 30 s. Steady-state VO2 was similar during supine and upright exercise. However, total VO2 during upright exercise was 0.30 L greater (p less than 0.05) than during supine exercise while O2 deficit and recovery VO2 in the upright position were 0.64 L and 0.22 L less (p less than 0.05) compared to the supine test. The larger O2 deficit during supine exercise resulted from a significantly greater VO2 halftime compared to that of the upright response. Despite the ability to eventually attain similar steady-state VO2, supine exercise results in a reduction of total VO2 capacity associated with an increase in the O2 deficit during submaximal constant-load exercise and manifested by elevated recovery VO2.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较仰卧位和直立位进行恒定负荷运动时的摄氧量(VO₂)、氧亏、稳态VO₂和恢复VO₂。十名男性受试者(36 - 40岁)分别在仰卧位和直立位进行了一次次最大运动测试,包括5分钟休息、以700 kg·min⁻¹的强度进行5分钟的自行车测力计运动以及10分钟的运动恢复。在所有测试中,每30秒采集2升等分空气样本,连续测量VO₂。仰卧位和直立位运动时的稳态VO₂相似。然而,直立位运动时的总VO₂比仰卧位运动时高0.30升(p < 0.05),而直立位的氧亏和恢复VO₂与仰卧位测试相比分别少0.64升和0.22升(p < 0.05)。仰卧位运动时较大的氧亏是由于与直立位反应相比,VO₂半衰期显著更长。尽管最终能够达到相似的稳态VO₂,但仰卧位运动导致次最大恒定负荷运动期间总VO₂能力降低,与氧亏增加相关,并表现为恢复VO₂升高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验