School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;18(3):227-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01012.x.
The authors sought to determine the diagnostic test characteristics of bedside emergency physician (EP)-performed ultrasound (US) for cholelithiasis in symptomatic emergency department (ED) patients.
A search was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, bibliographies of previous systematic reviews, and abstracts from major emergency medicine conference proceedings. We included studies that prospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of emergency US (EUS) for cholelithiasis, compared to a criterion reference standard of radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or surgical findings. Two authors independently performed relevance screening of titles and abstracts, extracted data, and performed the quality analysis. Disagreements were resolved by conference between the two reviewers. EUS performance was assessed with summary receiver operator characteristics curve (SROC) analysis, with independently pooled sensitivity and specificity values across included studies.
The electronic search yielded 917 titles; eight studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a sample of 710 subjects. All included studies used appropriate selection criteria and reference standards, but only one study reported uninterpretable or indeterminate results. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.4% to 92.5%) and 88.0% (95% CI = 83.7% to 91.4%), respectively.
This study suggests that in patients presenting to the ED with pain consistent with biliary colic, a positive EUS scan may be used to arrange for appropriate outpatient follow-up if symptoms have resolved. In patients with a low pretest probability, a negative EUS scan should prompt the clinician to consider an alternative diagnosis.
作者旨在确定急诊医师(EP)在急诊科有症状的患者中进行床旁超声(US)检查诊断胆囊结石的诊断测试特征。
对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、以前系统评价的参考文献以及主要急诊医学会议论文集的摘要进行了检索。我们纳入了前瞻性评估急诊 US(EUS)诊断胆囊结石准确性的研究,将其与放射科进行的超声检查(RADUS)、计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)或手术结果进行比较。两名作者独立进行标题和摘要的相关性筛选、提取数据,并进行质量分析。通过两位审稿人的会议解决了分歧。EUS 表现通过汇总接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)分析进行评估,通过纳入研究的独立汇总敏感性和特异性值进行评估。
电子检索产生了 917 个标题;八项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入了 710 例患者。所有纳入的研究均使用了适当的选择标准和参考标准,但只有一项研究报告了无法解释或不确定的结果。敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值分别为 89.8%(95%置信区间[CI] = 86.4%至 92.5%)和 88.0%(95% CI = 83.7%至 91.4%)。
本研究表明,在急诊科出现符合胆绞痛的疼痛的患者中,如果症状已缓解,阳性 EUS 扫描可用于安排适当的门诊随访。在具有低术前可能性的患者中,阴性 EUS 扫描应促使临床医生考虑替代诊断。