• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在哮喘患者中,与丙酸氟替卡松相比,吸入糠酸莫米松治疗可减少短效 β(2) 激动剂的使用并提高依从性。

Treatment with inhaled mometasone furoate reduces short-acting β(2) agonist claims and increases adherence compared to fluticasone propionate in asthma patients.

机构信息

Eympres Research, LLC, Hilliard, OH 43026, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.001
PMID:21402302
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Differences between mometasone furoate (MF), administered once daily, and fluticasone propionate (FP), administered twice daily, dosing regimens may affect adherence and short-acting β(2) agonist (SABA) use. The objective of this analysis was to compare asthma control outcomes in matched cohorts of MF- and FP-treated asthma patients stratified by SABA claims.

METHODS

A retrospective pharmacy claims database analysis identified matched cohorts of asthma patients (aged 12-65 years) who initiated treatment with MF or FP. Patients with none, one to four, five to eight, or more than eight SABA preindex claims were stratified to categories A, B, C, and D, respectively. Bivariate analyses compared postindex SABA canister claims, adherence, and exacerbations; multivariate analyses compared postindex SABA canister claims.

RESULTS

Matched patients in categories A (n = 2517 per cohort) and B (n = 2329 per cohort) were analyzed; insufficient sample sizes were identified for categories C and D. Postindex bivariate analyses indicated that MF cohorts had fewer SABA claims compared to FP cohorts (category A, 0.80 vs. 1.17 [P < 0.0001]; category B, 1.39 vs. 1.58 [P < 0.0001]), better adherence to the index drug (category A, 24% vs. 15% [P < 0.0001]; category B, 27% vs. 15% [P < 0.0001]), and fewer exacerbations (category A, 0.17 vs. 0.19 [P = 0.011]; category B, 0.17 vs. 0.21 [P = 0.008]). Multivariate analyses indicated that MF cohorts had fewer postindex SABA claims compared to FP cohorts in categories A and B (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Data for SABA claims, treatment adherence, and exacerbations suggest that, compared to twice-daily FP, once-daily MF may provide better asthma control.

摘要

目的

倍氯米松糠酸酯(MF)每日 1 次给药与丙酸氟替卡松(FP)每日 2 次给药,两种给药方案的差异可能会影响用药依从性和短效β2 受体激动剂(SABA)的使用。本分析的目的是比较 SABA 用药情况分层的 MF 和 FP 治疗哮喘患者匹配队列的哮喘控制结局。

方法

回顾性药物使用数据库分析确定了起始接受 MF 或 FP 治疗的哮喘患者匹配队列(年龄 12-65 岁)。无、1-4、5-8、8 次以上 SABA 预索引用药索赔的患者分别分层至 A、B、C 和 D 类。双变量分析比较了 SABA 药罐用药、用药依从性和哮喘加重情况;多变量分析比较了 SABA 药罐用药情况。

结果

分析了 A 类(每队列 2517 例患者)和 B 类(每队列 2329 例患者)的匹配患者;C 类和 D 类的样本量不足。SABA 药罐用药的双变量分析显示,MF 队列的 SABA 用药比 FP 队列少(A 类 0.80 比 1.17[P<0.0001];B 类 1.39 比 1.58[P<0.0001]),对指数药物的用药依从性更好(A 类 24%比 15%[P<0.0001];B 类 27%比 15%[P<0.0001]),哮喘加重更少(A 类 0.17 比 0.19[P=0.011];B 类 0.17 比 0.21[P=0.008])。多变量分析表明,A 类和 B 类 MF 队列的 SABA 用药比 FP 队列少(P<0.0001)。

结论

SABA 用药、治疗依从性和哮喘加重的数据表明,与每日 2 次 FP 相比,每日 1 次 MF 可能提供更好的哮喘控制。

相似文献

1
Treatment with inhaled mometasone furoate reduces short-acting β(2) agonist claims and increases adherence compared to fluticasone propionate in asthma patients.在哮喘患者中,与丙酸氟替卡松相比,吸入糠酸莫米松治疗可减少短效 β(2) 激动剂的使用并提高依从性。
Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.001.
2
Mometasone furoate versus beclomethasone dipropionate: effectiveness in patients with mild asthma.糠酸莫米松与丙酸倍氯米松治疗轻度哮喘的疗效比较。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul 1;16(7):e151-6.
3
Adherence and asthma control with mometasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate in adolescents and young adults with mild asthma.糠酸莫米松与丙酸氟替卡松对轻度哮喘青少年及青年患者的依从性和哮喘控制情况比较
J Asthma. 2010 Nov;47(9):994-1000. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2010.513076.
4
Risk of asthma exacerbation, asthma-related health care utilization and costs, and adherence to controller therapy in patients with asthma receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol inhalation powder 100 μg/50 μg versus mometasone furoate inhalation powder.使用丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗吸入粉100μg/50μg与糠酸莫米松吸入粉的哮喘患者的哮喘加重风险、哮喘相关医疗保健利用及费用,以及对控制药物治疗的依从性。
J Asthma. 2013 Apr;50(3):287-95. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.754028. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
5
Dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma using fluticasone propionate as an active comparator.以丙酸氟替卡松作为活性对照药的糠酸莫米松干粉吸入剂治疗中度持续性哮喘的剂量范围研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Apr;86(4):397-404. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62485-4.
6
Effects of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination on asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs and adherence in children and adults with asthma.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药对哮喘儿童和成人哮喘相关医疗资源利用、成本及依从性的影响。
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):560-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.011.
7
Asthma-related exacerbations, therapy switching, and therapy discontinuation: a comparison of 3 commonly used controller regimens.哮喘相关的病情加重、治疗方案转换及治疗中断:三种常用控制方案的比较
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec;95(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61015-0.
8
Outcomes and costs of patients with persistent asthma treated with beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane or fluticasone propionate.接受丙酸倍氯米松氢氟烷烃或丙酸氟替卡松治疗的持续性哮喘患者的结局和成本。
Adv Ther. 2009 Aug;26(8):762-75. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0056-z. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
9
Association between previous health care use and initiation of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among US patients with asthma.美国哮喘患者中既往医疗保健使用与吸入皮质类固醇和长效β2-肾上腺素能激动剂联合治疗起始的相关性。
Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.007.
10
Mometasone furoate vs fluticasone propionate with salmeterol: multivariate analysis of resource use and asthma-related charges.糠酸莫米松与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗:资源利用和哮喘相关费用的多变量分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):2895-901. doi: 10.1185/03007990903336515.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Outcomes Associated With Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Overuse in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.哮喘中短效β受体激动剂过度使用相关的不良结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Allergy. 2025 Jun;80(6):1629-1646. doi: 10.1111/all.16538. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems.克服患者依从性障碍:开发创新药物传递系统的案例。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023 May;22(5):387-409. doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00670-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Measuring Medication Adherence in a Population-Based Asthma Administrative Pharmacy Database: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
在基于人群的哮喘管理药房数据库中测量药物依从性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 22;13:981-1010. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S333534. eCollection 2021.
4
Real-world effects of once vs greater daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing on medication adherence.每日一次与更大剂量吸入性皮质类固醇对药物依从性的真实世界影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Sep;111(3):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: a randomized trial.在成年和青少年持续性哮喘患者中,糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机试验。
Chest. 2013 Oct;144(4):1222-1229. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0178.