Kovacs G T, King C, Cameron I, Cushnahan L, Wood E C, Leeton J F, Renou P, Shekleton P, Lenz S, Baker G
Infertility Medical Centre, Epworth Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Mar;16(1):39-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1990.tb00213.x.
A retrospective analysis was undertaken to compare the less invasive technique of vaginal ultrasonic-guided oocyte retrieval with the standard laparoscopic technique. We have shown that the outcome of the transvaginal technique with respect to oocytes harvested, fertilization rate, and pregnancy rate is comparable with the laparoscopy technique. We have also shown that 9 clinicians with little previous expertise in ultrasound have been able to incorporate this technique into a busy and successful in vitro fertilization unit.
进行了一项回顾性分析，以比较阴道超声引导下卵母细胞采集这种侵入性较小的技术与标准腹腔镜技术。我们已经表明，经阴道技术在采集的卵母细胞数量、受精率和妊娠率方面的结果与腹腔镜技术相当。我们还表明，9名以前几乎没有超声专业知识的临床医生已经能够将该技术纳入一个繁忙且成功的体外受精单元。
