Deutinger J, Reinthaller A, Csaicsich P, Riss P, Fischl F, Bernaschek G, Müller-Tyl E
2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987 Oct;26(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(87)90047-5.
Laparoscopy is the most commonly used procedure for oocyte retrieval in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) program. In this study we compared the results of 21 laparoscopic and 21 sonographically guided transvaginal oocyte retrievals using a vaginal probe. Laparoscopically 3.7 and transvaginally 4.8 oocytes per patient were recovered. Overall 6 pregnancies were achieved, giving a pregnancy rate of 14.1% per patient. Vaginal follicular aspiration resulted in a higher oocyte recovery rate. The advantages of the method were a shorter operation time, a superficial anesthesia and, compared to laparoscopy, a less invasive and simpler technique. Therefore this method is now commonly used for routine IVF procedures in our institution.
腹腔镜检查是体外受精（IVF）程序中最常用的取卵方法。在本研究中，我们比较了21例腹腔镜取卵和21例使用阴道探头超声引导经阴道取卵的结果。腹腔镜取卵每位患者平均获得3.7个卵母细胞，经阴道取卵每位患者平均获得4.8个卵母细胞。总体上共实现了6例妊娠，每位患者的妊娠率为14.1%。经阴道卵泡抽吸术导致更高的卵母细胞回收率。该方法的优点是手术时间更短、采用表面麻醉，并且与腹腔镜检查相比，侵入性更小、技术更简单。因此，该方法目前在我们机构常用于常规IVF程序。
