Center for Disability Research at the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Apr;53(4):396-404. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31820f3863.
To compare occurrence of repeated disability episodes across types of health care providers who treat claimants with new episodes of work-related low back pain (LBP).
A total of 894 cases followed 1 year using workers' compensation claims data. Provider types were defined for the initial episode of disability and subsequent episode of health maintenance care.
Controlling for demographics and severity, the hazard ratio [HR] of disability recurrence for patients of physical therapists (HR = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0 to 3.9) or physicians (HR = 1.6; 95% CI = 0.9 to 6.2) was higher than that of chiropractor (referent, HR = 1.0), which was similar to that of the patients non-treated after return to work (HR = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.4 to 3.8).
In work-related nonspecific LBP, the use of health maintenance care provided by physical therapist or physician services was associated with a higher disability recurrence than in chiropractic services or no treatment.
比较治疗新发与工作相关下背痛(LBP)的索赔者的各类医疗保健提供者之间重复残疾发作的发生率。
共有 894 例病例使用工人补偿索赔数据进行了 1 年的随访。为残疾的初始发作和随后的健康维持治疗发作定义了提供者类型。
在控制人口统计学和严重程度后,物理治疗师(HR = 2.0;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.0 至 3.9)或医生(HR = 1.6;95%CI = 0.9 至 6.2)的患者残疾复发的风险比(HR)高于整脊医师(参照,HR = 1.0),与重返工作后未接受治疗的患者(HR = 1.2;95%CI = 0.4 至 3.8)相似。
在与工作相关的非特异性 LBP 中,使用物理治疗师或医生提供的健康维持护理与更高的残疾复发率相关,而与整脊服务或不治疗相关。