Suppr超能文献

工作相关下背痛的健康维护护理及其与残疾复发的关系。

Health maintenance care in work-related low back pain and its association with disability recurrence.

机构信息

Center for Disability Research at the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Apr;53(4):396-404. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31820f3863.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare occurrence of repeated disability episodes across types of health care providers who treat claimants with new episodes of work-related low back pain (LBP).

METHOD

A total of 894 cases followed 1 year using workers' compensation claims data. Provider types were defined for the initial episode of disability and subsequent episode of health maintenance care.

RESULTS

Controlling for demographics and severity, the hazard ratio [HR] of disability recurrence for patients of physical therapists (HR = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0 to 3.9) or physicians (HR = 1.6; 95% CI = 0.9 to 6.2) was higher than that of chiropractor (referent, HR = 1.0), which was similar to that of the patients non-treated after return to work (HR = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.4 to 3.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In work-related nonspecific LBP, the use of health maintenance care provided by physical therapist or physician services was associated with a higher disability recurrence than in chiropractic services or no treatment.

摘要

目的

比较治疗新发与工作相关下背痛(LBP)的索赔者的各类医疗保健提供者之间重复残疾发作的发生率。

方法

共有 894 例病例使用工人补偿索赔数据进行了 1 年的随访。为残疾的初始发作和随后的健康维持治疗发作定义了提供者类型。

结果

在控制人口统计学和严重程度后,物理治疗师(HR = 2.0;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.0 至 3.9)或医生(HR = 1.6;95%CI = 0.9 至 6.2)的患者残疾复发的风险比(HR)高于整脊医师(参照,HR = 1.0),与重返工作后未接受治疗的患者(HR = 1.2;95%CI = 0.4 至 3.8)相似。

结论

在与工作相关的非特异性 LBP 中,使用物理治疗师或医生提供的健康维持护理与更高的残疾复发率相关,而与整脊服务或不治疗相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验