Dear Peter, Jasanoff Sheila
Department of History, McGraw Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Isis. 2010 Dec;101(4):759-74. doi: 10.1086/657475.
The boundaries between the history of science and science and technology studies (STS) can be misleadingly drawn, to the detriment of both fields. This essay stresses their commonalities and potential for valuable synergy. The evolution of the two fields has been characterized by lively interchange and boundary crossing, with leading scholars functioning easily on both sides of the past/present divide. Disciplines, it is argued, are best regarded as training grounds for asking particular kinds of questions, using particular clusters of methods. Viewed in this way, history of science and STS are notable for their shared approaches to disciplining. The essay concludes with a concrete example--regulatory science--showing how a topic such as this can be productively studied with methods that contradict any alleged disciplinary divide between historical and contemporary studies of science.
科学史与科学技术研究(STS)之间的界限可能会被误导性地划分,这对两个领域都不利。本文强调它们的共性以及产生有价值协同作用的潜力。这两个领域的发展特点是充满活力的交流与跨界,顶尖学者能轻松穿梭于过去与现在的界限两边。有人认为,学科最好被视为提出特定类型问题、运用特定方法组合的训练场。从这个角度看,科学史和科学技术研究在学科规范方法上具有显著的共同之处。本文最后给出了一个具体例子——监管科学,展示了如何运用与科学历史研究和当代研究之间所谓学科划分相矛盾的方法,卓有成效地研究这样一个主题。