Valladares Liliana
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1311-1337. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00293-0. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Post-truth is a social condition that threatens the trust in science and people's critical thinking. This paper analyzes some of the educational responses to post-truth, claiming the potential contributions of Science and Technology Studies (STS). Some of the responses based on traditional epistemology, characterized as , are contrasted with some of the possible responses based on a more complex and interdisciplinary knowledge of science and technology. It is argued that epistemological vaccines, despite having an enormous value in fighting against post-truth, are insufficient to transform this social condition and its implications for science and technology. It is sustained that a social epistemology and, moreover, an expert interdisciplinary approach to the knowledge of science and technology, such as the one offered by STS, is required to consolidate stronger educational strategies, formulating , that could be useful as a counterweight to understand and deconstruct post-truth. Given that the STS academic field has developed a good account of how scientific facts and social trust in science are constructed, it also has the capacity to show how post-truth and alternative facts are constructed, unmasking for whom it is important that we decry science. The conclusion points toward the urgency to rethink the current influence of the STS field in the educational context to relocate the STS education.
后真相是一种威胁对科学的信任和人们批判性思维的社会状况。本文分析了对后真相的一些教育应对措施,主张科学技术研究(STS)的潜在贡献。一些基于传统认识论的应对措施,其特点是……,与一些基于对科学技术更复杂和跨学科知识的可能应对措施形成对比。有人认为,认识论疫苗尽管在对抗后真相方面具有巨大价值,但不足以改变这种社会状况及其对科学技术的影响。有人坚持认为,需要一种社会认识论,而且需要一种对科学技术知识的专家跨学科方法,比如STS提供的那种方法,来巩固更强有力的教育策略,制定……,这可能有助于作为理解和解构后真相的一种平衡力量。鉴于STS学术领域已经很好地阐述了科学事实以及对科学的社会信任是如何构建的,它也有能力展示后真相和替代事实是如何构建的,揭示对哪些人来说诋毁科学很重要。结论指出迫切需要重新思考STS领域在教育背景下的当前影响力,以便重新定位STS教育。