Suppr超能文献

疾病感知与糖尿病血糖控制:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Illness perceptions and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Primary Medical Care, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, York, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2011 Nov;28(11):1300-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03298.x.

Abstract

AIMS

The Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire have been widely used to measure people's beliefs about diabetes. This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the relationship between the dimensions of the Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and HbA(1c) level in adults with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in January 2010 to identify relevant studies. Random-effects model meta-analyses were conducted with cross-sectional data to quantify the relationship between Illness Perception Questionnaire dimensions and HbA(1c) across studies. Randomized controlled trials that targeted Illness Perception Questionnaire perceptions and included HbA(1c) as an outcome measure were discussed in a narrative review.

RESULTS

Nine cross-sectional studies and four randomized controlled trials were included. Stronger Identity (r+=0.14), Consequences (r+=0.14), Timeline Cyclical (r+ = 0.26) Concern (r+= 0.21), and Emotional Representations (r+=0.18) perceptions had significant positive associations with HbA(1c.) Greater Personal Control (r+=- 0.12) was negatively associated with HbA(1c) . For all relationships, heterogeneity tests were non-significant, suggesting little variability in effect size estimates. Two of the four randomized controlled trials successfully changed illness perceptions, with one also reporting an intervention group reduction in HbA(1c).

CONCLUSIONS

Some Illness Perception Questionnaire dimensions had small significant associations with HbA(1c) , although the direction of these associations remains unclear. There was also tentative evidence that illness perceptions can be positively changed through targeted intervention and that these changes may also impact on glycaemic control. Future research could benefit from tailoring intervention content to perceptions that are most highly associated with HbA(1c).

摘要

目的

《疾病感知问卷》《修订版疾病感知问卷》和《简明疾病感知问卷》已被广泛用于测量人们对糖尿病的信念。本综述旨在综合评估《疾病感知问卷》《修订版疾病感知问卷》和《简明疾病感知问卷》各维度与成年糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))水平之间关系的证据。

方法

2010 年 1 月进行了系统文献检索,以确定相关研究。对横断面数据进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析,以量化各研究中《疾病感知问卷》维度与 HbA(1c)之间的关系。对以《疾病感知问卷》认知为靶向且将 HbA(1c)作为结局指标的随机对照试验进行了叙述性综述。

结果

共纳入 9 项横断面研究和 4 项随机对照试验。较强的认同感(r+=0.14)、后果感(r+=0.14)、时间循环感(r+=0.26)、担忧感(r+=0.21)和情感表达感(r+=0.18)与 HbA(1c)呈显著正相关。较强的个人控制感(r+=-0.12)与 HbA(1c)呈负相关。对于所有的关系,异质性检验均无统计学意义,提示效应量估计值的变异性较小。4 项随机对照试验中有 2 项成功地改变了疾病认知,其中 1 项试验还报告干预组的 HbA(1c)降低。

结论

一些《疾病感知问卷》维度与 HbA(1c)有小的显著关联,但这些关联的方向仍不明确。有初步证据表明,通过有针对性的干预可以积极改变疾病认知,并且这些改变可能也会影响血糖控制。未来的研究可以从最能与 HbA(1c)相关的感知角度出发,使干预内容更具针对性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验