• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Validity of death certificates in the study of ischemic heart diseases].

作者信息

Nuttens M C, Salomez J L, Tillard B, Richard J L, Pons E, Huart J, Bocquet P

机构信息

Pasteur de Lille, MONICA Lille, Institut Pasteur.

出版信息

Presse Med. 1990 Jun 16;19(24):1143-6.

PMID:2141933
Abstract

Mortality rates for ischaemic heart disease, as estimated from death certificates, show highly significant differences between countries. In order to study the validity of mortality rates for ischaemic heart disease, the authors, involved in the MONICA project, have compared the results obtained from the conventional death certificate code with the data collected in a complementary enquiry conducted for all deaths possibly due to ischaemic heart disease. Three hundred and thirty patients, aged from 25 to 64 years, belonging to the urban community of Lille, and who died between October 1 and December 31, 1984, were included in this study. The sensitivity of the death certificate for the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease was 77.9 percent and its specificity was 95.9 percent. The concordance rate between death certificate and complementary enquiry was not modified by age, sex, socio-professional category, family situation, place of death and doctor who signed the certificate. The complementary study proved impossible in 31.8 percent of the cases, usually because the doctor who signed the death certificate was not fully conversant with the patient's condition. Our results therefore confirm that death certificates are valid to study mortality from ischaemic heart disease.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Validity of death certificates in the study of ischemic heart diseases].
Presse Med. 1990 Jun 16;19(24):1143-6.
2
Out-of-hospital coronary death in an urban population--validation of death certificate diagnosis. The Minnesota Heart Survey.城市人口院外冠心病死亡——死亡证书诊断的验证。明尼苏达心脏调查。
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;125(6):1012-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114617.
3
Accuracy of death certificates for coding coronary heart disease as the cause of death.将冠心病列为死因的死亡证明的准确性。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12):1020-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00005.
4
[Evaluation of mortality caused by ischemic heart disease in Haute-Garonne].[上加龙省缺血性心脏病所致死亡率评估]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1990 Dec;83(14):2103-9.
5
Validation of coronary heart disease death certificate diagnoses.冠心病死亡证明诊断的验证
N Z Med J. 1988 Oct 26;101(856 Pt 1):658-60.
6
[Coronary disease in France: data from the MONICA registers (1985-1991)].[法国的冠心病:莫尼卡登记处数据(1985 - 1991年)]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44 Suppl 1:S46-52.
7
Validation of death certificate diagnosis of out-of-hospital coronary heart disease deaths in Olmsted County, Minnesota.明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县院外冠心病死亡病例死亡证明诊断的验证
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Jul;75(7):681-7. doi: 10.4065/75.7.681.
8
Gender- and age-specific trends in coronary heart disease mortality in France from 2000 to 2007: results from the MONICA registers.2000年至2007年法国冠心病死亡率的性别和年龄特异性趋势:莫妮卡登记处的结果
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):117-22. doi: 10.1177/2047487312452967. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
Validation of death certificate diagnosis for coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.冠心病死亡证明诊断的验证:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jan;54(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00272-9.
10
Validity of death certificates for coding coronary heart disease as the cause of death in Bahrain.巴林将冠心病列为死因的死亡证明的有效性。
East Mediterr Health J. 2000 Jul;6(4):661-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Ill-defined and multiple causes on death certificates--a study of misclassification in mortality statistics.死亡证明上死因不明且原因多样——一项关于死亡率统计中错误分类的研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;15(2):141-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1007570405888.