Suppr超能文献

城市人口院外冠心病死亡——死亡证书诊断的验证。明尼苏达心脏调查。

Out-of-hospital coronary death in an urban population--validation of death certificate diagnosis. The Minnesota Heart Survey.

作者信息

Folsom A R, Gomez-Marin O, Gillum R F, Kottke T E, Lohman W, Jacobs D R

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;125(6):1012-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114617.

Abstract

To assess the validity of death certificate diagnoses of out-of-hospital coronary heart disease deaths, the authors studied a one-third random sample of out-of-hospital deaths occurring in 1979 in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, residents. Death certificates with diagnoses possibly containing coronary heart disease deaths were enumerated, and cause of death was recorded from the certificate in two ways: as the first listed ("immediate") cause and as the "underlying cause" assigned by a trained nosologist. Validation was performed by standardized physician review of information obtained about the death, which included one or more of the following: an interview with a relative or friend, physician report, autopsy report, medical record, and/or nursing home record. Missing information was frequent, but cases with at least an informant interview and/or autopsy report (82%) were representative and could be used for validation. The sensitivity and specificity of the underlying cause of coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes 410-414, 427) on the death certificate were 90.3% and 82.7%, respectively, compared with the physician-assigned diagnosis. For the immediate cause, sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% and 67.9%, respectively. These findings suggest that the validity of death certificates for out-of-hospital coronary heart disease death is high, as assessed by this method of retrospective physician review.

摘要

为评估院外冠心病死亡的死亡证明诊断的有效性,作者研究了1979年发生在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯 - 圣保罗市居民院外死亡的三分之一随机样本。列出了诊断可能包含冠心病死亡的死亡证明,并以两种方式从证明中记录死因:作为首次列出的(“直接”)死因和作为由训练有素的疾病分类学家指定的“根本死因”。通过对获取的关于死亡的信息进行标准化医生审查来进行验证,这些信息包括以下一项或多项:与亲属或朋友的访谈、医生报告、尸检报告、病历和/或疗养院记录。缺失信息很常见,但至少有 informant 访谈和/或尸检报告的病例(82%)具有代表性,可用于验证。与医生指定的诊断相比,死亡证明上冠心病根本死因(《国际疾病分类》第九版,代码410 - 414、427)的敏感性和特异性分别为90.3%和82.7%。对于直接死因,敏感性和特异性分别为90.3%和67.9%。这些发现表明,通过这种回顾性医生审查方法评估,院外冠心病死亡的死亡证明有效性很高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验