Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1781-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.089. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
We evaluated the effect of pulse rate changes on the clinical response to and stimulation related pain symptoms of sacral neuromodulation treatment.
In this pilot study we evaluated the effect of 4 pulse rates, including 5.2, 10, 21 and 40 Hz, in patients with a suboptimal response to sacral neuromodulation. The effect of each frequency was evaluated during a 6-day test period. To avoid the carryover effect stimulation was discontinued for 24 hours between consecutive test periods. On the last 3 days of each test period a voiding diary and questionnaire were completed. Changes in the clinical response and pain symptoms were compared between the 4 pulse rates using multivariate analysis.
Of the 50 patients included in the study 40 (80%) were female. Mean ± SD age was 55.5 ± 12.3 years. Of the patients 41 (82%) had overactive bladder symptoms and 9 (18%) were in chronic nonobstructive urinary retention. No significant difference was found in clinical outcome on the voiding diary and questionnaire between the pulse rates and none of the 4 rates was significantly related to sacral neuromodulation associated pain. However, individuals appeared to benefit from changing the pulse rate in terms of treatment efficacy and stimulation related pain.
On the group level none of the 4 pulse rates appeared to have a significantly different effect on clinical outcome or sacral neuromodulation related pain. However, an individualized approach to optimize treatment efficacy by changing the pulse rate appears to be useful.
我们评估了脉冲频率变化对骶神经调节治疗临床反应和刺激相关疼痛症状的影响。
在这项初步研究中,我们评估了包括 5.2Hz、10Hz、21Hz 和 40Hz 在内的 4 种脉冲频率对骶神经调节反应不佳的患者的影响。在 6 天的测试期内评估每种频率的效果。为了避免交叉效应,在连续测试期之间停止刺激 24 小时。在每个测试期的最后 3 天,完成排尿日记和问卷调查。使用多变量分析比较 4 种脉冲频率之间的临床反应和疼痛症状变化。
在纳入研究的 50 名患者中,有 40 名(80%)为女性。平均年龄 ± 标准差为 55.5 ± 12.3 岁。41 名患者(82%)有膀胱过度活动症症状,9 名(18%)为慢性非梗阻性尿潴留。在排尿日记和问卷调查的临床结果方面,各脉冲率之间无显著差异,且 4 种率均与骶神经调节相关疼痛无显著相关性。然而,个体似乎从改变脉冲率方面受益于治疗效果和刺激相关疼痛。
在群体水平上,4 种脉冲率似乎都对临床结果或骶神经调节相关疼痛没有显著不同的影响。然而,通过改变脉冲率来优化治疗效果的个体化方法似乎是有用的。