• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[痴呆晚期认知状态的简短评估:简易精神状态检查表严重程度量表西班牙语版验证的初步结果]

[Short evaluation of cognitive state in advanced stages of dementia: preliminary results of the Spanish validation of the Severe Mini-Mental State Examination].

作者信息

Buiza Cristina, Navarro Ana, Díaz-Orueta Unai, González Mari Feli, Alaba Javier, Arriola Enrique, Hernández Carmen, Zulaica Amaia, Yanguas José Javier

机构信息

Fundación Instituto Gerontológico Matia-INGEMA, Donostia-San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2010.09.006. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.regg.2010.09.006
PMID:21420199
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The cognitive assessment of patients with advanced dementia needs proper screening instruments that allow obtain information about the cognitive state and resources that these individuals still have. The present work conducts a Spanish validation study of the Severe Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients with advanced dementia (Mini-Cognitive Examination [MEC]<11) were evaluated with the Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale, MEC, SMMSE and Severe Cognitive Impairment Profile scales.

RESULTS

All test items were discriminative. The test showed high internal (α=0.88), test-retest (0.64 to 1.00, P<.01) and between observers reliabilities (0.69-1.00, p<0.01), both for scores total and for each item separately. Construct validity was tested through correlations between the instrument and MEC scores (r=0.59, P<0.01). Further information on the construct validity was obtained by dividing the sample into groups that scored above or below 5 points in the MEC and recalculating their correlations with SMMSE. The correlation between the scores in the SMMSE and MEC was significant in the MEC 0-5 group (r=0.55, P<.05), but not in the MEC>5 group. Additionally, differences in scores were found in the SMMSE, but not in the MEC, between the three GDS groups (5, 6 and 7) (H=11.1, P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The SMMSE is an instrument for the assessment of advanced cognitive impairment which prevents the floor effect through an extension of lower measurement range relative to that of the MEC. From our results, this rapid screening tool and easy to administer, can be considered valid and reliable.

摘要

引言

对晚期痴呆患者进行认知评估需要合适的筛查工具,以便获取这些个体的认知状态及尚存能力的信息。本研究对简易精神状态检查量表(SMMSE)进行了西班牙语版本的效度验证。

材料与方法

对47例晚期痴呆患者(简易认知检查量表[MEC]<11)使用雷斯伯格总体衰退量表、MEC、SMMSE和严重认知障碍概况量表进行评估。

结果

所有测试项目均具有鉴别性。该测试在总分及各项目上均显示出较高的内部信度(α=0.88)、重测信度(0.64至1.00,P<0.01)及观察者间信度(0.69 - 1.00,P<0.01)。通过该工具与MEC评分之间的相关性检验建构效度(r=0.59,P<0.01)。通过将样本分为MEC评分高于或低于5分的组,并重新计算其与SMMSE的相关性,获得了关于建构效度的更多信息。SMMSE与MEC评分之间的相关性在MEC 0 - 5分组中显著(r=0.55,P<0.05),但在MEC>5分组中不显著。此外,在SMMSE中发现了三个总体衰退量表分组(5、6和7)之间的评分差异,但在MEC中未发现(H=11.1,P<0.05)。

结论

SMMSE是一种用于评估晚期认知障碍的工具,相对于MEC,它通过扩展较低测量范围避免了地板效应。根据我们的结果,这种快速筛查工具易于实施,可认为是有效且可靠的。

相似文献

1
[Short evaluation of cognitive state in advanced stages of dementia: preliminary results of the Spanish validation of the Severe Mini-Mental State Examination].[痴呆晚期认知状态的简短评估:简易精神状态检查表严重程度量表西班牙语版验证的初步结果]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2010.09.006. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
2
A useful and brief cognitive assessment for advanced dementia in a population with low levels of education.一种适用于教育水平较低人群中晚期痴呆的有用且简短的认知评估方法。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;32(5):295-300. doi: 10.1159/000335358. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
3
[Overal cognitive assessment in Basque-speaking people with advanced dementia. Validation to the Basque language of the Severe Mini-Mental State Examination SMMSE (SMMSE-eus)].
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2018 Jul-Aug;53(4):208-212. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2017.10.003. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Identifying the most efficient items from the Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment in older Taiwanese patients.从简易精神状态检查表中识别出对台湾老年患者认知功能评估最有效的项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):502-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01551.x.
5
[A comparison between 2 abbreviated Spanish versions of mental status assessment in the diagnosis of dementia. Study data on elderly community residents].[两种简化西班牙语版精神状态评估在痴呆诊断中的比较。老年社区居民研究数据]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Mar 13;112(9):330-4.
6
The development and validation of a carer questionnaire to assess cognitive function in neuropsychiatric patients.一份用于评估神经精神疾病患者认知功能的照料者调查问卷的开发与验证
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Jul;63(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.02.004.
7
Do the ABCS 135 short cognitive screen and its subtests discriminate between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment and dementia?ABCS 135简短认知筛查及其子测试能否区分正常认知、轻度认知障碍和痴呆?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;22(3):189-94. doi: 10.1002/gps.1659.
8
Is the geriatric depression scale a reliable screening tool for depressive symptoms in elderly patients with cognitive impairment?老年抑郁量表是否可作为认知障碍老年患者抑郁症状的可靠筛查工具?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;24(6):556-62. doi: 10.1002/gps.2154.
9
Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage.一项针对基层医疗使用的6项认知障碍测试的验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;14(11):936-40.
10
[[Validity of the Cognitive Mini-Exam of Lobo et al. for the detection of dementia-associated cognitive deterioration] ].[洛博等人的认知迷你测试在检测痴呆相关认知衰退方面的有效性]
Neurologia. 2000 Oct;15(8):337-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Malnourishment in the Institutionalized Older Population: The FRAGILESS Study.机构养老老年人群营养不良的决定因素:FRAGILESS研究
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 28;16(23):4114. doi: 10.3390/nu16234114.
2
Improving Sleep Quality, Daytime Sleepiness, and Cognitive Function in Patients with Dementia by Therapeutic Exercise and NESA Neuromodulation: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.通过治疗性运动和 NESA 神经调节改善痴呆症患者的睡眠质量、日间嗜睡和认知功能:一项多中心临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 6;20(21):7027. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20217027.
3
Caregiver training: Evidence of its effectiveness for cognitive and functional improvement in older adults.
照顾者培训:对老年人认知和功能改善的有效性证据。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Mar;32(5-6):736-748. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16301. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
[Spanish tools of cognitive and behavior assessment of alzheimer´s disease in severe state.].[西班牙用于重度阿尔茨海默病认知与行为评估的工具。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Sep 21;94:e202009099.
5
Association between adiposity levels and cognitive impairment in the Chilean older adult population.智利老年人群体中肥胖水平与认知障碍之间的关联。
J Nutr Sci. 2019 Oct 9;8:e33. doi: 10.1017/jns.2019.24. eCollection 2019.
6
Continuation versus discontinuation of treatment for severe dementia: randomized, pragmatic, open-label, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of continuing drug treatment in patients with severe dementia (STOP-DEM).继续或停止治疗重度痴呆:一项随机、实用、开放标签、临床试验,旨在评估继续药物治疗对重度痴呆患者(STOP-DEM)的疗效。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1122-2.
7
Gender Differences in Symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life, Sleep Quality, Mental Health, Cognitive Performance, Pain-Cognition, and Positive Health in Spanish Fibromyalgia Individuals: The Al-Ándalus Project.西班牙纤维肌痛患者在症状、健康相关生活质量、睡眠质量、心理健康、认知表现、疼痛认知及积极健康方面的性别差异:安达卢斯项目
Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:5135176. doi: 10.1155/2016/5135176. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Multisensory Stimulation as an Intervention Strategy for Elderly Patients With Severe Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.多感官刺激作为重度痴呆老年患者的干预策略:一项初步随机对照试验
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Jun;31(4):341-50. doi: 10.1177/1533317515618801. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
Social robots in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症中的社交机器人
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Sep 3;7:133. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133. eCollection 2015.
10
Validation of the multimodal assessment of capacities in severe dementia: a novel cognitive and functional scale for use in severe dementia.重度痴呆患者能力多模态评估的验证:一种用于重度痴呆的新型认知与功能量表
J Neurol. 2015 May;262(5):1198-208. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7692-9. Epub 2015 Mar 6.