Bermejo F, Morales J M, Valerga C, del Ser T, Artolazábal J, Gabriel R
Servicio de Neurología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Mar 13;112(9):330-4.
There are several Spanish versions and adaptations of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the most used abbreviated test for screening of the cognitive decline in clinical and epidemiological setting. Among them, the Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (MEC) is highlighted. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic usefulness between the Spanish translation of the MMSE (the MMSE1 which incorporates the proof of serial "sevens" and the MMSE2 which includes spelling "world" backward) and the MEC for the diagnosis of dementia.
A sample of elderly persons (65 years or over), included in a population-based study of dementia prevalence. The diagnosis of dementia was assessed through exhaustive neuropsychological evaluation. The diagnosis of dementia (according to the standardized DSM-III-R criteria) was carried out by expert neurologists, who were independent and blind to the scores obtained in the MMSE and MEC.
79 subjects underwent both tools and neuropsychological assessment. The MMSE1 obtained the highest accuracy (92%), followed by the MEC (90%) and the MMSE2 (83%). The analysis of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves did not show significant statistical differences between the MMSE1 and MEC (p = 0.38), but significant differences were observed between those and the MMSE2 (p = 0.01).
The diagnostic usefulness of Spanish translation of the MMSE is similar to the MEC. The proof of spelling "world" backward obtained poorer results than serial "sevens". The Spanish versions of the MMSE should be improved to be adapted to our cultural characteristics.
简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)有多种西班牙语版本及改编版本,它是临床和流行病学环境中用于筛查认知功能衰退最常用的简易测试。其中,简易认知测试(MEC)尤为突出。本研究旨在比较MMSE的西班牙语翻译版本(包含连续做“7”减法测试的MMSE1和倒着拼写“world”的MMSE2)与MEC在痴呆诊断中的诊断效用。
以老年人群(65岁及以上)为样本,纳入一项基于人群的痴呆患病率研究。通过全面的神经心理学评估来评估痴呆诊断。痴呆诊断(根据标准化的DSM-III-R标准)由独立且对MMSE和MEC得分不知情的神经科专家进行。
79名受试者接受了这两种工具测试及神经心理学评估。MMSE1的准确率最高(92%),其次是MEC(90%),MMSE2为(83%)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积分析显示,MMSE1和MEC之间无显著统计学差异(p = 0.38),但它们与MMSE2之间存在显著差异(p = 0.01)。
MMSE的西班牙语翻译版本与MEC的诊断效用相似。倒着拼写“world”的测试结果比连续做“7”减法测试的结果差。MMSE的西班牙语版本应加以改进以适应我们的文化特征。