Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Med Image Anal. 2011 Aug;15(4):514-28. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
Real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) promises a more objective and complete cardiac functional analysis by dynamic 3D image acquisition. Despite several efforts towards automation of left ventricle (LV) segmentation and tracking, these remain challenging research problems due to the poor-quality nature of acquired images usually containing missing anatomical information, speckle noise, and limited field-of-view (FOV). Recently, multi-view fusion 3D echocardiography has been introduced as acquiring multiple conventional single-view RT3DE images with small probe movements and fusing them together after alignment. This concept of multi-view fusion helps to improve image quality and anatomical information and extends the FOV. We now take this work further by comparing single-view and multi-view fused images in a systematic study. In order to better illustrate the differences, this work evaluates image quality and information content of single-view and multi-view fused images using image-driven LV endocardial segmentation and tracking. The image-driven methods were utilized to fully exploit image quality and anatomical information present in the image, thus purposely not including any high-level constraints like prior shape or motion knowledge in the analysis approaches. Experiments show that multi-view fused images are better suited for LV segmentation and tracking, while relatively more failures and errors were observed on single-view images.
实时 3D 超声心动图 (RT3DE) 通过动态 3D 图像采集有望提供更客观、更全面的心脏功能分析。尽管已经进行了多次自动化左心室 (LV) 分割和跟踪的尝试,但由于获取的图像质量较差,通常包含缺失的解剖信息、斑点噪声和有限的视野 (FOV),这些仍然是具有挑战性的研究问题。最近,多视图融合 3D 超声心动图已被引入,通过小探头移动采集多个常规的单视图 RT3DE 图像,并在对齐后将它们融合在一起。这种多视图融合的概念有助于提高图像质量和解剖信息,并扩展视野。我们现在通过系统研究比较单视图和多视图融合图像来进一步推进这项工作。为了更好地说明差异,这项工作使用图像驱动的 LV 心内膜分割和跟踪来评估单视图和多视图融合图像的图像质量和信息内容。图像驱动的方法被用于充分利用图像中的图像质量和解剖信息,因此在分析方法中没有包括任何高级约束,例如先验形状或运动知识。实验表明,多视图融合图像更适合 LV 分割和跟踪,而单视图图像则观察到相对更多的失败和错误。